MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Scudo » 2010

FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
51.9% pass rate
from 649 tests in 2017
(22% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 13% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 13% fail on Position lamps (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 12% fail on Front lamps (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.4% fail on Stop lamp (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Direction indicators (71% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Flashing type (71% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Individual lamps (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.9% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Switch
      • 0.46% fail on Lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Horn
    • 0.15% fail on Battery
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 21% fail on Suspension (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 13% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 13% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 13% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.15% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms (99% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.31% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 4.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.46% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components
      • 3.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal
        • 1.2% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.92% fail on Components (64% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.77% fail on Hoses
        • 0.15% fail on Pipes
      • 0.46% fail on Leaks
    • 0.62% fail on ABS
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Restricted movement
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Washers (64% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.46% fail on Size/type
  • 5.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.62% fail on System
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
    • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (59% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Power steering
      • 0.46% fail on Operation
      • 0.46% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.15% fail on Drive system
      • 0.15% fail on Rams
    • 0.62% fail on Steering system (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.15% fail on Drag link end
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.46% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.46% fail on Doors
      • 0.31% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.15% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.31% fail on Body condition
    • 0.31% fail on Seats
      • 0.31% fail on Passengers
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.15% fail on Load security
      • 0.15% fail on Loading door
    • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.31% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.15% fail on Towbars
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Condition