FIAT Scudo MOT Results
Registered in 201051.9% pass rate
from 649 tests in 2017
(22% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(32% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 13% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
13% fail on
Position lamps
(81% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 12% fail on Front lamps (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.15% fail on All position lamps
- 9.4% fail on Stop lamp (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Direction indicators
(71% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
(71% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Individual lamps (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.15% fail on Switch
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
(71% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.15% fail on Switch
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.9% fail on Fog lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Hazard warning
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.62% fail on Switch
- 0.46% fail on Lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Horn
- 0.15% fail on Battery
- 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(54% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
13% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 13% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.15% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
-
13% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.31% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(99% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.31% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.15% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
0.15% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.15% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.15% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.2% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.46% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.46% fail on Front wheels
- 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.0% fail on
Hub components
- 3.9% fail on Brake pads
- 0.62% fail on Brake discs
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
- 1.2% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
-
1.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.92% fail on
Components
(64% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.77% fail on Hoses
- 0.15% fail on Pipes
- 0.46% fail on Leaks
-
0.92% fail on
Components
(64% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.62% fail on ABS
-
0.46% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.46% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Restricted movement
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.2% fail on Wipers (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Washers (64% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
- 0.31% fail on Mirrors
- 0.15% fail on Bonnet
-
6.5% fail on
Tyres
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 0.46% fail on Size/type
-
5.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Exhaust system (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.77% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.62% fail on System
- 0.15% fail on Pipe
- 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.5% fail on
Steering
(59% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.92% fail on
Power steering
- 0.46% fail on Operation
- 0.46% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.15% fail on Drive system
- 0.15% fail on Rams
-
0.62% fail on
Steering system
(81% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack
- 0.15% fail on Drag link end
-
0.92% fail on
Power steering
-
1.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.62% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.46% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.46% fail on
Doors
- 0.31% fail on Passengers other
- 0.15% fail on Passengers front
- 0.31% fail on Body condition
-
0.31% fail on
Seats
- 0.31% fail on Passengers
- 0.15% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.15% fail on
Load security
- 0.15% fail on Loading door
- 0.15% fail on Spare wheel
-
0.46% fail on
Doors
-
0.31% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.31% fail on Registration plate
-
0.15% fail on
Towbars
- 0.15% fail on Towbar
-
0.15% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Condition