FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
50.4% pass rate
from 689 tests in 2020
(14% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (31% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Stop lamp (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps (60% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Position lamp (64% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Direction indicators (89% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Flashing type (89% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.73% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Horn
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 15% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 14% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 14% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 1.3% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Pipe
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
      • 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.15% fail on System
    • 0.44% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.44% fail on Engine mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.15% fail on Bracket
    • 0.29% fail on Body
      • 0.15% fail on Body condition
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
    • 0.15% fail on Chassis
      • 0.15% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 7.5% fail on Suspension arms (73% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.58% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.44% fail on Springs (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Coil spring (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.15% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 5.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.44% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.1% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.15% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.87% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.87% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.58% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.44% fail on Cable
        • 0.15% fail on Lever
    • 0.87% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.73% fail on Pedal
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.58% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.58% fail on Lever
    • 0.44% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.29% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.29% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 8.9% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.44% fail on View to rear
      • 0.44% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 3.3% fail on Steering
    • 2.0% fail on Steering linkage components (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.73% fail on Power steering
      • 0.44% fail on Operation
      • 0.29% fail on Other components
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.44% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.29% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
    • 0.29% fail on Steering wheel (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (48% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.73% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (67% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.29% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.87% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.58% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.87% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
  • 0.87% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.87% fail on Registration plates