FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2016
70.2% pass rate
from 131 tests in 2020
(32% worse than other 2016 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (19% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (27% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (16% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (25% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (25% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 9.2% fail on Brakes (56% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.76% fail on Linkage
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance (11% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt
          • 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.76% fail on Lever
  • 6.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (12 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seats (22 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Driver's seat (33 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.76% fail on Spare wheel condition
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility (6.4% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (45% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Washers (65% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (13% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (65% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 3.1% fail on Suspension (6.4% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (98% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (5.4% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (1.2% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.76% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.76% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.76% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates