FIAT Swift MOT Results
Registered in 201791.4% pass rate
from 1,612 tests in 2021
(65% better than other 2017 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Swift is unusually good or bad.
-
4.2% fail on
Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Wipers (54% worse than other 2017 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Washers (90% better than other 2017 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(73% better than other 2017 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(51% better than other 2017 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2017 vans)
- 0.062% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.37% fail on
Headlamps
(80% better than other 2017 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp (82% better than other 2017 vans)
- 0.062% fail on Dipswitch
- 0.37% fail on Stop lamp (77% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.25% fail on
Direction indicators
(80% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.25% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2017 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.25% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.062% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.062% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.062% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.062% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.062% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.062% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.062% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.062% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.062% fail on Horn
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(51% better than other 2017 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Brakes
(76% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.99% fail on
Brake performance
(50% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.74% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.74% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.25% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.25% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.25% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.74% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
- 0.062% fail on Pedal
-
0.12% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(96% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.062% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.062% fail on Brake pads
-
0.062% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.062% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
0.062% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.99% fail on
Brake performance
(50% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.50% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.50% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
-
0.062% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.062% fail on Condition
-
0.25% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(90% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.19% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(92% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Compression ignition
(93% better than other 2017 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (92% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.062% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.062% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Compression ignition
(93% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.062% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.062% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.19% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(92% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(92% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.062% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.062% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.062% fail on
Transmission
-
0.062% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.062% fail on Joints
-
0.062% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.062% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.062% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.062% fail on Registration plates
-
0.062% fail on
Tyres
- 0.062% fail on Tread depth