Ford P100 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
63.1% pass rate
from 122 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford P100 is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 15% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.4% fail on Rear lamps (160% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 6.6% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.6% fail on Switch
      • 0.82% fail on Tell tale
    • 6.6% fail on Horn
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.82% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.82% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 4.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.1% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.82% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.82% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.82% fail on Switch
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 0.82% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.82% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.82% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.82% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.82% fail on Lamp
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 5.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.82% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.1% fail on Components
        • 2.5% fail on Hoses
        • 2.5% fail on Valves
        • 0.82% fail on Pipes
      • 0.82% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components
      • 0.82% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.82% fail on Brake discs
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.6% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.82% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.8% fail on Suspension (51% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.3% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.5% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.82% fail on Shackle
    • 0.82% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
  • 9.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 9.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 9.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.82% fail on Attachment
  • 7.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.3% fail on Body condition
    • 2.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis
    • 0.82% fail on Body security
    • 0.82% fail on Doors
      • 0.82% fail on Drivers
    • 0.82% fail on Seats
      • 0.82% fail on Drivers
  • 5.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.82% fail on Cap
      • 0.82% fail on System
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.82% fail on Free play
        • 0.82% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.82% fail on Power steering
      • 0.82% fail on Operation
      • 0.82% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.5% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1992 vans)