Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2005
53.5% pass rate
from 4,248 tests in 2017
(6.8% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 10% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.047% fail on Switch
    • 8.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.047% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (46% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Direction indicators (30% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Flashing type (30% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp (36% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps (22% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp (21% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.024% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.75% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Horn (66% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.21% fail on Hazard warning (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Switch (71% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.094% fail on Rear reflectors (78% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Couplings
        • 0.047% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.68% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.33% fail on Universal joint (15 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (51% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
      • 0.071% fail on Condition
      • 0.047% fail on Presence
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms (20% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (24% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
      • 0.094% fail on Condition
    • 3.5% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Shackle (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Anchor (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Other pins and bushes
      • 0.071% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.047% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.047% fail on Securing bolts
      • 0.024% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers (55% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (54% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Fitment
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (63% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Component mounting (61% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Spring mounting (70% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Subframe mounting (58% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Wheel bearings (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Front (57% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear (75% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Front suspension joints (66% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.047% fail on General condition
    • 0.047% fail on Torsion bars (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment (12 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.024% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.024% fail on Condition
    • 0.024% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.024% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Brakes (9.7% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems (35% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.7% fail on Components (37% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 7.7% fail on Pipes (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Valves (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Hoses
        • 0.094% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.024% fail on Servos
      • 0.75% fail on Leaks (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.024% fail on Operation
    • 7.3% fail on Brake performance (31% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Front wheels (40% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear wheels (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance (51% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake operation (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 1.9% fail on ABS
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components (41% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.14% fail on Brake discs (85% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.024% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.024% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.52% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components (57% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal (57% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Condition
        • 0.071% fail on Anti-slip (87% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Parking brake (90% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.071% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.047% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.094% fail on Mechanical components (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Cable (72% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.024% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.024% fail on Components
        • 0.024% fail on Pipes
  • 8.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (23% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers (17% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Washers (28% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Windscreen (54% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Mirrors (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.89% fail on Emissions
    • 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.52% fail on Fuel system (55% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Pipe
      • 0.071% fail on Tank
      • 0.071% fail on System (83% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Cap (84% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres (41% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth (20% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (18% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.26% fail on Doors (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers
      • 0.094% fail on Passengers other (71% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.094% fail on Seats (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Drivers
    • 0.071% fail on Body security
    • 0.047% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.024% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.024% fail on Load security
      • 0.024% fail on Hinged tailboard
  • 2.9% fail on Steering (54% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering system (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.38% fail on Drag link end (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Steering box (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
        • 0.19% fail on Steering pivot point (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Free play
        • 0.14% fail on Steering box (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.047% fail on Lock stop (15 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.024% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.047% fail on Pump
      • 0.047% fail on Rams
    • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.094% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.047% fail on Steering control
      • 0.047% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.024% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate (38% worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 1.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (72% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
      • 0.42% fail on Prescribed areas (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Requirements
    • 0.14% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (92% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (92% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment
  • 0.28% fail on Towbars
    • 0.14% fail on Towbar
    • 0.14% fail on Vehicle structure