Ford Transit Connect MOT Results
Registered in 200547.2% pass rate
from 9,890 tests in 2021
(11% worse than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Transit Connect is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(23% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(91% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.74% fail on Linkage (87% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (64% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings (82% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(52% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (50% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (72% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.051% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.030% fail on Suspension arm (78% better than other 2005 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Springs
(44% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Leaf springs
(41% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Leaf spring (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.071% fail on Shackle bracket
- 0.030% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.030% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
- 0.010% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.010% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
- 0.85% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (46% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Leaf springs
(41% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.69% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover (91% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint (42% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.071% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.58% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.35% fail on Sub-frame (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (58% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.010% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.010% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers (89% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.091% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.061% fail on Ball joint
- 0.020% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.010% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.051% fail on
Macpherson strut
(75% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.030% fail on Ball joint dust cover (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.010% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.010% fail on Ball joint
-
0.020% fail on
Axles
(86% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Axle
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(91% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
23% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(13% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 8.4% fail on Stop lamp (43% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (43% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
6.0% fail on
Headlamps
(48% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Headlamp (58% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device (66% better than other 2005 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(14% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Flashing type
(14% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.47% fail on All direction indicators (98% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Side repeaters (71% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Switch
-
4.1% fail on
Flashing type
(14% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(13% better than other 2005 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (18% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.91% fail on Battery(ies) (55% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Horn (43% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.030% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(51% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(51% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (51% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.010% fail on Switch
-
0.010% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.010% fail on Front fog lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(51% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.54% fail on Position lamp
- 0.020% fail on All position lamps
-
0.091% fail on
Hazard warning
(83% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.091% fail on Switch (83% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.081% fail on Rear reflectors (83% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.030% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.020% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.010% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
22% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(64% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(100% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
8.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 8.5% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.071% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.061% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.49% fail on
Prop shafts
(42% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Joints (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
8.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Exhaust system (97% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
5.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(110% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.061% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.061% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.030% fail on Strengthening plate
-
2.5% fail on
Chassis
(20% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Chassis condition (20% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.010% fail on Strengthening plate
- 1.4% fail on Bumpers (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.75% fail on
Engine mounting
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Engine mounting condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.081% fail on Bracket
-
0.72% fail on
Seats
(79% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.59% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.53% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.18% fail on Pipe
- 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.10% fail on Tank (58% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.081% fail on Hose
- 0.010% fail on System
-
0.53% fail on
Body
(35% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Other body component
- 0.14% fail on Panel (52% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Body condition
- 0.040% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.24% fail on
Doors
(69% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Other passenger's door
(70% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.091% fail on Door condition (72% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.010% fail on Catch
-
0.091% fail on
Front passenger's door
(66% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.091% fail on Door condition (66% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.010% fail on Catch
-
0.051% fail on
Driver's door
(75% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.030% fail on Door condition (83% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Hinge
-
0.10% fail on
Other passenger's door
(70% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.16% fail on
Cabs
(46% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.040% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.030% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.010% fail on Carrier
- 0.040% fail on Passenger compartment (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.030% fail on
Towbar
- 0.020% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.010% fail on Towbar condition
- 0.020% fail on Floor
-
0.020% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.020% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.010% fail on Other boot lid component
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(100% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
8.4% fail on
Brake performance
(21% better than other 2005 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.89% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.010% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.13% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.12% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.010% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.020% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.020% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
-
3.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(42% better than other 2005 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (42% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.030% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.010% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(18% better than other 2005 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(18% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.98% fail on Service brake performance (30% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.030% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.020% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.010% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(18% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
(27% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
(27% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (27% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.040% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.040% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.030% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.010% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.010% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.010% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
(27% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
- 7.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (50% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.040% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.020% fail on Electronic stability control (86% better than other 2005 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(26% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.010% fail on Brake linings
-
0.85% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(31% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.83% fail on Brake discs (30% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Brake drums
-
0.10% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(81% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Cable (75% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.75% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.58% fail on Pedal
- 0.20% fail on Hand lever
-
0.32% fail on
Parking brake control
(41% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Lever (41% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.24% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.081% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.030% fail on Servos
- 0.020% fail on Valves
- 0.061% fail on Load sensing valves (91% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.051% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.030% fail on Servos
- 0.010% fail on Operation
- 0.010% fail on Leaks
-
0.040% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(82% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.030% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (78% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.010% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.020% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(89% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Other components
-
0.010% fail on
Pressure storage reservoirs
- 0.010% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
-
8.4% fail on
Brake performance
(21% better than other 2005 vans)
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 6.2% fail on Wipers (16% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Washers (13% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.85% fail on
Condition of glass
(85% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Windscreen (89% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.010% fail on Window
-
0.67% fail on
View to rear
- 0.65% fail on Mirrors
- 0.020% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.27% fail on Bonnet
- 0.010% fail on Driver's view
-
9.2% fail on
Tyres
(51% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Tread depth (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Condition (53% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Size/type
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(43% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
6.4% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 6.2% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.010% fail on Requirements
- 0.36% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.051% fail on
Airbags
- 0.040% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.010% fail on Passengers airbag
-
6.4% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
5.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(19% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(17% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
3.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(27% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested (94% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (54% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.081% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.051% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.040% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.020% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
- 0.010% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.010% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
0.51% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.071% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.030% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
3.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(27% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Fluid leaks
(43% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.051% fail on Other leaks
- 0.040% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.010% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
0.010% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.010% fail on Undertray
-
4.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(17% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Steering
(41% better than other 2005 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(52% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end (52% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint (56% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Drag link end
- 0.010% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.010% fail on Steering arm
-
0.010% fail on
Other components
- 0.010% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.010% fail on Locking devices
-
0.91% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.89% fail on Steering rack
- 0.020% fail on Steering box
-
0.71% fail on
Power steering
- 0.42% fail on Other components (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Operation
- 0.091% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.061% fail on Rams
-
0.12% fail on
Steering play
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
- 0.030% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.010% fail on Steering column
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(52% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.93% fail on
Road Wheels
(140% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.82% fail on Attachment (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Condition
- 0.020% fail on Hubs
-
0.81% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.81% fail on Registration plates
-
0.10% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.10% fail on Speedometer