Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Hyundai H100 MOT Results

Registered in 1998
34.5% pass rate
from 84 tests in 2017
(35% worse than other 1998 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Hyundai H100 is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 17% fail on Registration plate lamp (130% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 12% fail on Fog lamp (200% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.2% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.2% fail on Lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Horn
  • 30% fail on Suspension
    • 20% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 11% fail on Spring mounting (170% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Component mounting
    • 6.0% fail on Leaf springs (5 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Shackle (13 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Anchor
      • 2.4% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage condition (8 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front
  • 26% fail on Brakes
    • 17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 13% fail on Components
        • 8.3% fail on Pipes
        • 4.8% fail on Valves
      • 3.6% fail on Leaks (4 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Brake performance not tested (9 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Restricted movement
  • 17% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (100% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 11% fail on Body condition (140% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 4.8% fail on Chassis
    • 3.6% fail on Doors
      • 1.2% fail on Drivers
      • 1.2% fail on Passengers front
      • 1.2% fail on Passengers other
    • 1.2% fail on Seats
      • 1.2% fail on Passengers
  • 17% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 11% fail on Washers
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on System
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Size/type
  • 4.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Requirements
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.2% fail on Steering system
      • 1.2% fail on Other components
        • 1.2% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 1.2% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 1.2% fail on Locking devices
  • 3.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.2% fail on Condition