Hyundai H100 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
37.9% pass rate
from 58 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Hyundai H100 is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Suspension (75% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 10% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Leaf springs (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Leaf spring
        • 1.7% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 3.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.2% fail on Linkage (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 5.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.2% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 31% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 14% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 8.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 6.9% fail on Horn
    • 5.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Rigid brake pipes (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Brake performance not tested (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 5.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 5.2% fail on Chassis
      • 5.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.4% fail on Body
      • 3.4% fail on Panel (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on Tank
  • 8.6% fail on Visibility
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
  • 8.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.4% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 5.2% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 8.6% fail on Tyres
    • 8.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 5.2% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering
      • 1.7% fail on Operation
  • 5.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 3.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plates