Isuzu D-Max MOT Results
Registered in 201676.1% pass rate
from 5,015 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu D-Max is unusually good or bad.
-
9.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (28% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
(43% better than other 2016 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2016 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.56% fail on
Headlamps
(71% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Direction indicators
(61% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
(61% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
(61% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.48% fail on
Reversing lamps
(170% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Reversing lamps (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.42% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.34% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.040% fail on Horn
-
0.40% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.40% fail on Position lamp
-
0.32% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(21 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (22 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.080% fail on Rear reflectors
-
4.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
5.4% fail on
Brakes
(16% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake performance
(28% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.92% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.90% fail on
Rbt
- 0.58% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.020% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.020% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.020% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.90% fail on
Rbt
-
0.64% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(61% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.100% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.34% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.28% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.040% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.020% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.020% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.28% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.34% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt
- 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.020% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt
- 0.100% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.92% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(43% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(34% better than other 2016 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads (34% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(71% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Brake discs (71% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.060% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.060% fail on Lever
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(34% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(87% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Electronic stability control (89% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.12% fail on Electronic braking system (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.20% fail on Pedal
- 0.18% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.34% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.34% fail on Lever
- 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.14% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.100% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.080% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.060% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.020% fail on Reservoirs
-
1.9% fail on
Brake performance
(28% better than other 2016 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Visibility
- 3.4% fail on Wipers (33% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Washers (26% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.24% fail on Windscreen
- 0.060% fail on Bonnet
-
0.060% fail on
View to rear
(85% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Mirrors (90% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension
(23% better than other 2016 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.080% fail on Linkage ball joints (82% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.040% fail on Linkage
- 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.64% fail on
Suspension arms
(50% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.26% fail on
Springs
(83% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.12% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.080% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.020% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
-
0.020% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.020% fail on Coil spring
-
0.24% fail on
Leaf springs
-
0.20% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Ball joint
- 0.020% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.020% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint
-
0.020% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.020% fail on Suspension unit
-
3.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(56% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Transmission
(64% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Drive shafts
(72% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Joints (78% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.100% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.100% fail on Joints
-
0.26% fail on
Drive shafts
(72% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Body
- 0.24% fail on Other body component
- 0.020% fail on Panel
- 0.20% fail on Bumpers
-
0.100% fail on
Towbar
(5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Other towbar components (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Towbar condition (33 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Safety device
-
0.080% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.080% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.040% fail on
Doors
-
0.020% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.020% fail on Door condition
-
0.020% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.020% fail on Door condition
-
0.020% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.020% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.020% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.020% fail on
Seats
- 0.020% fail on Driver's seat
-
3.2% fail on
Tyres
(31% better than other 2016 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Size/type
-
1.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(42% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(40% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.00% fail on
Compression ignition
(37% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.28% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.22% fail on
Spark ignition
(54% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (60% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.020% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.00% fail on
Compression ignition
(37% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.040% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.020% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.020% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
1.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(40% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.68% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (73% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.100% fail on
Seat belts
(83% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.080% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.040% fail on
Airbags
- 0.040% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.22% fail on
Steering
(79% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.18% fail on
Steering linkage components
(76% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Track rod end (78% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint
-
0.020% fail on
Power steering
- 0.020% fail on Operation
- 0.020% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.18% fail on
Steering linkage components
(76% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Attachment