Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results
Registered in 200247.2% pass rate
from 53 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 19% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 15% fail on Headlamp aim
-
7.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.8% fail on Front lamps
- 3.8% fail on Rear lamps
- 7.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
28% fail on
Suspension
-
9.4% fail on
Leaf springs
(7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
9.4% fail on
Pins and bushes
(20 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 9.4% fail on Shackle (25 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Anchor
-
9.4% fail on
Pins and bushes
(20 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.5% fail on Front suspension joints
-
5.7% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 5.7% fail on Front
-
5.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 5.7% fail on Condition
-
5.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 3.8% fail on Component mounting
- 1.9% fail on Spring mounting
-
5.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
5.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 5.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
5.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
3.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
9.4% fail on
Leaf springs
(7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
26% fail on
Brakes
-
21% fail on
Brake performance
- 7.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 5.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.8% fail on Front wheels
- 3.8% fail on Brake performance not tested (16 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
-
9.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.4% fail on
Components
- 7.5% fail on Pipes
- 1.9% fail on Valves
- 1.9% fail on Leaks
-
9.4% fail on
Components
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake control components
-
3.8% fail on
Pedal
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Anti-slip
-
3.8% fail on
Pedal
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Restricted movement
-
21% fail on
Brake performance
-
25% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 15% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Emissions
- 5.7% fail on Emissions not tested (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.9% fail on Pipe
- 1.9% fail on Cap
-
15% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 11% fail on Washers
- 7.5% fail on Wipers
-
13% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 9.4% fail on Body condition
-
5.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 5.7% fail on Chassis
-
3.8% fail on
Doors
- 1.9% fail on Drivers
- 1.9% fail on Passengers other
-
11% fail on
Steering
-
7.5% fail on
Steering system
- 3.8% fail on Drag link end (26 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
-
1.9% fail on
Other components
- 1.9% fail on Steering pivot point
-
1.9% fail on
Steering control
- 1.9% fail on Steering column
-
1.9% fail on
Power steering
- 1.9% fail on Operation
- 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
-
7.5% fail on
Steering system
-
5.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.7% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.8% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 3.8% fail on Registration plate