MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » Rodeo » 2002
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2002
47.2% pass rate
from 53 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 19% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 19% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 15% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on All direction indicators
  • 28% fail on Suspension
    • 9.4% fail on Leaf springs (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Pins and bushes (20 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 9.4% fail on Shackle (25 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Anchor
    • 7.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 5.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 5.7% fail on Front
    • 5.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 5.7% fail on Condition
    • 5.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.9% fail on Spring mounting
    • 5.7% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.7% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 26% fail on Brakes
    • 21% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.8% fail on Brake performance not tested (16 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 9.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.4% fail on Components
        • 7.5% fail on Pipes
        • 1.9% fail on Valves
      • 1.9% fail on Leaks
    • 3.8% fail on Service brake control components
      • 3.8% fail on Pedal
        • 1.9% fail on Condition
        • 1.9% fail on Anti-slip
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Restricted movement
  • 25% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 15% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Emissions
    • 5.7% fail on Emissions not tested (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.9% fail on Pipe
      • 1.9% fail on Cap
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 11% fail on Washers
    • 7.5% fail on Wipers
  • 13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 9.4% fail on Body condition
    • 5.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 5.7% fail on Chassis
    • 3.8% fail on Doors
      • 1.9% fail on Drivers
      • 1.9% fail on Passengers other
  • 11% fail on Steering
    • 7.5% fail on Steering system
      • 3.8% fail on Drag link end (26 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.9% fail on Other components
        • 1.9% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.9% fail on Steering control
      • 1.9% fail on Steering column
    • 1.9% fail on Power steering
      • 1.9% fail on Operation
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate