Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results
Registered in 200354.8% pass rate
from 104 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
9.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(180% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(180% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 9.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(180% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.96% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.96% fail on Position lamp
-
0.96% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.96% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.96% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.96% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.96% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.96% fail on Horn
-
9.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(180% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 9.6% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.96% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
3.8% fail on
Springs
-
3.8% fail on
Leaf springs
(3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.96% fail on Leaf spring
-
3.8% fail on
Leaf springs
(3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.96% fail on Shock absorbers
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension arms
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
8.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Rbt
- 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.96% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.96% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.96% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.96% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.96% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
5.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.96% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.96% fail on Brake pads
-
0.96% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.96% fail on Brake discs
-
0.96% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
8.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 6.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.8% fail on
Transmission
-
3.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.8% fail on Joints
-
0.96% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.96% fail on Joints
-
3.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.96% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.96% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.96% fail on Bumpers
-
9.6% fail on
Visibility
- 5.8% fail on Washers
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
-
0.96% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.96% fail on Windscreen
-
5.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.8% fail on
Compression ignition
- 2.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.96% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.9% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.9% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.8% fail on
Steering
-
3.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.8% fail on Track rod end
-
0.96% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.96% fail on Operation
-
3.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
4.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.96% fail on Condition
-
1.9% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.9% fail on Registration plates
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.96% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.96% fail on Condition
- 0.96% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.96% fail on
Seat belts