Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2003
50.8% pass rate
from 118 tests in 2020
(3.5% worse than other 2003 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (29% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Suspension arms (43% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (24% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 5.9% fail on Wheel bearings (180% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Springs (71% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.85% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (49% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers (66% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.85% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 25% fail on Brakes (31% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (19% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (27% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (11% worse than other 2003 vans)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (9.0% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (41% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.85% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (13% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (26% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (60% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (66% worse than other 2003 vans)
          • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (86% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (66% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 10% fail on Rigid brake pipes (95% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (25% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.85% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake fluid (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.85% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps (0.045% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp (14% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (25% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (42% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (53% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (53% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.85% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.85% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.85% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.85% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (14% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system (42% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Transmission (16% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts (20% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Joints (40% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.85% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.85% fail on Joints
    • 3.4% fail on Chassis (33% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Chassis condition (34% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (40% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (39% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Towbar (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.85% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 1.7% fail on Body (86% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Mounting fixings (26 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Load security
      • 0.85% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.85% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 12% fail on Visibility (12% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers (7.3% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Washers (28% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.85% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.85% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.85% fail on View to rear
      • 0.85% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.2% fail on Steering (39% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components (46% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end (39% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.85% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.85% fail on Steering play
      • 0.85% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (12% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (6.8% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Compression ignition (33% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (12% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (34% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth (13% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (36% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 0.85% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.85% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas