MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » Rodeo » 2003

Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2003
50.0% pass rate
from 164 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 6.7% fail on Fog lamp
    • 5.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.61% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.61% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (63% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (76% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.61% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.61% fail on Lamp
    • 0.61% fail on Horn
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.8% fail on Components
        • 9.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.61% fail on Hoses
      • 1.8% fail on Operation (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on ABS
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components
      • 0.61% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.61% fail on Brake discs
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 9.1% fail on Leaf springs (8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Shackle (21 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.61% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 6.1% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 4.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 4.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.7% fail on Front
      • 0.61% fail on Rear
    • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.61% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.61% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.5% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.8% fail on Pipe (10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Tank
      • 0.61% fail on System
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Emissions
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.7% fail on Washers
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.61% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.61% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.9% fail on Steering system
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.61% fail on Free play
        • 0.61% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.61% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.61% fail on Other components
        • 0.61% fail on Steering pivot point
  • 4.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition
    • 0.61% fail on Body security
    • 0.61% fail on Doors
      • 0.61% fail on Passengers other
  • 3.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.61% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.61% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment
  • 0.61% fail on Towbars
    • 0.61% fail on Towbar
  • 0.61% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plate