Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2004
57.9% pass rate
from 857 tests in 2020
(17% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.12% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (47% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (66% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (69% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (69% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.93% fail on Individual direction indicators (60% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.82% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.82% fail on Electrical equipment (71% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Horn (69% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.12% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
  • 18% fail on Suspension (18% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (33% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.9% fail on Springs
      • 3.2% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.35% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 0.82% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (56% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 14% fail on Brakes (28% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance (51% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (62% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (48% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (63% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (68% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.93% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance (76% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt (70% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance (67% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (57% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Brake linings and pads (65% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Brake pads (65% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.58% fail on Cable
      • 0.23% fail on Brake discs and drums (81% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.12% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.82% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.47% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.35% fail on Pedal
    • 0.47% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.47% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.35% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.35% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.35% fail on Lever
    • 0.12% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.12% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.12% fail on Other braking system component
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (59% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Chassis
      • 3.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.8% fail on Transmission (43% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.12% fail on Prop shaft
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (71% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (74% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shaft
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Tank
      • 0.35% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.23% fail on System
      • 0.12% fail on Pipe
    • 0.93% fail on Integral vehicle structure (61% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (60% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Body
      • 0.47% fail on Panel
      • 0.35% fail on Other body component
      • 0.12% fail on Body condition
    • 0.35% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
        • 0.12% fail on Catch
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility (27% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.23% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.12% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.12% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
          • 0.12% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.23% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.70% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.70% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.6% fail on Steering (35% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.47% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
    • 0.35% fail on Steering coupling (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Universal joint (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Steering play
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.12% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Rams
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (63% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.70% fail on Seat belts (79% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Airbags
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates