Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results
Registered in 201157.7% pass rate
from 956 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(19% worse than other 2011 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamps
(49% worse than other 2011 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp (58% worse than other 2011 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.73% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.8% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 0.42% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.31% fail on Individual direction indicators (83% better than other 2011 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (36% better than other 2011 vans)
-
0.84% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.42% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.21% fail on Horn
-
0.73% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.73% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.42% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.42% fail on Switch
-
0.31% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.31% fail on Position lamp
- 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
-
6.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
7.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.94% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (17 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.73% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.10% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.31% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
-
1.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.84% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.10% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.84% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.6% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(3 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Hand lever
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(51% better than other 2011 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(47% better than other 2011 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2011 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Brake linings
-
0.73% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.73% fail on Brake discs
-
0.21% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.21% fail on Cable
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(47% better than other 2011 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.0% fail on Lever
- 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.31% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.10% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.21% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.10% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.10% fail on Operation
-
7.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(26% better than other 2011 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Springs
-
4.9% fail on
Leaf springs
(2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.73% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
-
0.21% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 2011 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Coil spring (93% better than other 2011 vans)
-
4.9% fail on
Leaf springs
(2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.8% fail on Ball joint
- 0.63% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 3.6% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2011 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(68% better than other 2011 vans)
- 0.94% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.84% fail on Linkage ball joints (68% better than other 2011 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Linkage
- 0.21% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.63% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.63% fail on Ball joint
- 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers
-
5.1% fail on
Springs
-
8.2% fail on
Visibility
- 4.4% fail on Wipers
- 3.7% fail on Washers
-
0.63% fail on
View to rear
- 0.52% fail on Mirrors
- 0.10% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.21% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.21% fail on Windscreen
-
4.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
2.3% fail on
Transmission
-
1.6% fail on
Prop shafts
(2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.10% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.94% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2011 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2011 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Drive shaft (10 times worse than other 2011 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Prop shafts
(2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.31% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.31% fail on Pipe
-
0.31% fail on
Seats
- 0.21% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.21% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.21% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.21% fail on
Chassis
- 0.21% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.21% fail on Bumpers
-
0.21% fail on
Body
- 0.21% fail on Other body component
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
-
0.10% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.10% fail on Door condition
-
0.10% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.10% fail on Door condition
-
0.10% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.10% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.10% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.10% fail on
Towbar
- 0.10% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.10% fail on
Cabs
- 0.10% fail on Steps
-
2.3% fail on
Transmission
-
3.5% fail on
Tyres
(42% better than other 2011 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2011 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Size/type
-
3.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.52% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.10% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.10% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts
(79% better than other 2011 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Requirements
-
1.3% fail on
Steering
(75% better than other 2011 vans)
-
0.52% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2011 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2011 vans)
-
0.52% fail on
Power steering
- 0.42% fail on Operation
- 0.10% fail on Other components
-
0.21% fail on
Steering play
- 0.21% fail on Steering rack
-
0.52% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2011 vans)
-
0.94% fail on
Road Wheels
(2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
0.73% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.73% fail on Registration plates