MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » TF » 2010

Isuzu TF MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.3% pass rate
from 483 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu TF is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.21% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.5% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.83% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.83% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.41% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.41% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.41% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.41% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 6.2% fail on Springs (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joints (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.62% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 5.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (84% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.41% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.83% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.21% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.62% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.62% fail on Cable
      • 0.41% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.21% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.21% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.83% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.62% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.62% fail on Lever
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.62% fail on View to rear
      • 0.62% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.21% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 3.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Transmission
      • 1.7% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Prop shaft
      • 0.41% fail on Drive shafts (87% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.21% fail on Joints
    • 0.83% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.41% fail on Body
      • 0.41% fail on Other body component
    • 0.21% fail on Chassis
      • 0.21% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.21% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.21% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.21% fail on Towbar
      • 0.21% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.21% fail on Cabs
      • 0.21% fail on Steps
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition (53% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.83% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.21% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
  • 0.62% fail on Steering (87% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
    • 0.21% fail on Steering play
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.41% fail on Attachment