Isuzu TF MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.3% pass rate
from 468 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu TF is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamps (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.4% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.21% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.64% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.64% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.43% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.21% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Springs
      • 6.2% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Leaf spring (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.21% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.85% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.21% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 6.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (50% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.43% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (29 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.21% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.64% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.64% fail on Cable
      • 0.21% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.21% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.85% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.85% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.21% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.21% fail on Leaks
    • 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.1% fail on Transmission
      • 3.4% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Joints (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Prop shaft
      • 0.64% fail on Drive shafts (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Joints (87% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Bearing housing
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Bumpers (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Body
      • 0.43% fail on Other body component
      • 0.21% fail on Panel
    • 0.21% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.21% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.21% fail on Chassis
      • 0.21% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
    • 0.21% fail on Cabs
      • 0.21% fail on Steps
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.85% fail on View to rear
      • 0.85% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.64% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.21% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Steering linkage components (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.21% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.43% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plates