IVECO Daily MOT Results
Registered in 200347.0% pass rate
from 1,397 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the IVECO Daily is unusually good or bad.
-
36% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(15% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 16% fail on Registration plate lamp (37% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
9.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.5% fail on Rear lamps (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Front lamps
- 0.36% fail on All position lamps
- 0.072% fail on Switch
- 8.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.8% fail on
Headlamps
(68% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Headlamp (63% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Switch
-
0.14% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.14% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.14% fail on Dipswitch (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.072% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.072% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
6.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(82% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.3% fail on Fog lamp (84% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Tell tale
- 0.14% fail on Switch
-
6.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(44% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
6.1% fail on
Flashing type
(44% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.72% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.50% fail on All direction indicators
-
6.1% fail on
Flashing type
(44% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.4% fail on Stop lamp (28% better than other 2003 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Battery (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Horn
- 0.86% fail on Rear reflectors (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.21% fail on
Outline marker lamps
(19 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Rear lamps (28 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Front lamps
-
0.14% fail on
Hazard warning
(82% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Lamp
- 0.072% fail on Switch
-
35% fail on
Brakes
(59% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
25% fail on
Brake performance
(91% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 18% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 9.6% fail on Rear wheels (63% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Front wheels (37% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.86% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Gradient hand brake
- 0.072% fail on Brake operation
-
19% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(87% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
16% fail on
Components
(64% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 10% fail on Pipes (58% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.7% fail on Valves (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Hoses (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (12 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
16% fail on
Components
(64% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Hub components
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs
- 0.29% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.14% fail on Brake back plates
-
2.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (42 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.072% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake
(66% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.2% fail on
Pedal
- 0.64% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Anti-slip
-
1.2% fail on
Pedal
- 1.1% fail on ABS (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.86% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.64% fail on Cable
- 0.21% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Linkage
- 0.72% fail on Restricted movement (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Components
(5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Pipes (12 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.072% fail on Valves
-
0.29% fail on
Components
(5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
25% fail on
Brake performance
(91% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(29% better than other 2003 vans)
-
4.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (58% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Linkage condition (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Leaf springs
(3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Pins and bushes
(4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Shackle (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.72% fail on Anchor (8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.57% fail on Securing bolts (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Anchor bracket (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Spring eye (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Spring saddle (13 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Shackle bracket
-
2.0% fail on
Pins and bushes
(4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
(47% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Component mounting (55% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Spring mounting (53% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.72% fail on Subframe mounting
-
3.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
3.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(70% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Fitment
- 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
(5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Attachment
- 0.43% fail on General condition (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.43% fail on
Wheel bearings
(82% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Rear
- 0.14% fail on Front (93% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.14% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.14% fail on
Axles
- 0.14% fail on Axle beam (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.072% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.072% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
4.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.2% fail on Wipers
- 3.8% fail on Washers
- 0.79% fail on Mirrors
- 0.72% fail on Windscreen
- 0.57% fail on Bonnet
-
11% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(62% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.2% fail on Body condition (74% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.9% fail on Chassis
-
1.3% fail on
Doors
- 0.72% fail on Drivers
- 0.36% fail on Passengers front
- 0.21% fail on Passengers other
- 0.072% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5)
- 0.072% fail on Emergency exits
-
1.0% fail on
Seats
(160% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.72% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Passengers
- 0.79% fail on Body security (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.14% fail on Speedometer
-
0.072% fail on
Steps and stairs
- 0.072% fail on Steps
-
0.072% fail on
Load security
- 0.072% fail on Hinged tailboard
-
8.9% fail on
Tyres
- 4.5% fail on Condition
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth
- 0.93% fail on Size/type (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Valve stem
-
7.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.5% fail on
Fuel system
(97% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.79% fail on Cap
- 0.50% fail on System
- 0.29% fail on Pipe
- 0.57% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.072% fail on Emissions
-
6.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.6% fail on Condition (87% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
-
2.1% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 2.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.072% fail on Drivers airbag
-
4.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.5% fail on
Steering
(53% better than other 2003 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Steering system
(61% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end (60% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Steering rack (68% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Free play
- 0.29% fail on Steering rack
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
-
0.072% fail on
Other components
- 0.072% fail on Steering pivot point
- 0.43% fail on Steering operation
-
0.43% fail on
Power steering
- 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.14% fail on Other components
- 0.072% fail on Operation
- 0.072% fail on Drive system
-
0.36% fail on
Steering control
-
0.36% fail on
Steering coupling
(4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Universal joint (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Steering coupling
(4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.4% fail on
Steering system
(61% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate
-
0.86% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.79% fail on Attachment (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Condition
-
0.29% fail on
Towbars
- 0.14% fail on Towbar
- 0.14% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.072% fail on
Driving Controls and Speed Limiters
- 0.072% fail on Speed limiter