Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

IVECO Daily MOT Results

Registered in 2005
47.5% pass rate
from 3,465 tests in 2017
(5.3% worse than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the IVECO Daily is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (25% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 15% fail on Registration plate lamp (45% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (26% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Rear lamps (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.78% fail on All position lamps (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Switch
    • 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim (18% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Fog lamp (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamps (78% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp (67% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Dipswitch (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.058% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Matched pair (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Direction indicators (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Flashing type (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Individual lamps (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.32% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Tell tales
      • 0.058% fail on Semaphore (19 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.029% fail on Switch
    • 5.5% fail on Battery (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp (23% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Horn (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.29% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.17% fail on Outline marker lamps (22 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Rear lamps (29 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on All outline markers (19 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Front lamps
    • 0.17% fail on Hazard warning (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Switch (79% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Lamp
      • 0.029% fail on Tell tale
  • 32% fail on Brakes (65% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 23% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake performance (200% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 10% fail on Rear wheels (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Front wheels (97% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance (91% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.029% fail on Brake operation
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Components (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Valves (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Hoses (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Pipes (67% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.029% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.029% fail on Servos
      • 3.8% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Operation (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Hub components (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (85% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.029% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.3% fail on Parking brake (91% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (91% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on ABS
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake control components (92% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (92% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Anti-slip (74% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.98% fail on Mechanical components (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Cable (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Lever
      • 0.058% fail on Linkage
    • 0.95% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (18 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.87% fail on Restricted movement (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Air and vacuum systems (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Components (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Valves (14 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Servos
      • 0.029% fail on Operation
      • 0.029% fail on Leaks
    • 0.058% fail on Additional braking devices (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 18% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (31% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage condition (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Presence (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Shackle (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Anchor (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Condition (76% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Securing bolts (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Spring eye (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Shackle bracket (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Anchor bracket (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Spring saddle (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting (44% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers (76% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Condition (77% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms (29% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (41% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Condition (12 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Attachment
    • 2.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 0.40% fail on Wheel bearings (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Rear
      • 0.17% fail on Front (90% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Axles (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Clearance (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Axle beam (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on General condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.087% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.029% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts (97% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.087% fail on Universal joint
        • 0.029% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.058% fail on Torsion bars (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Attachment (15 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.058% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.058% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.058% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.058% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.058% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.029% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.029% fail on Location
    • 0.029% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.029% fail on Suspension unit
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Body condition (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Vehicle structure (98% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis (98% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 0.49% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.40% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.32% fail on Drivers
      • 0.087% fail on Emergency exits
    • 0.81% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Seats
      • 0.29% fail on Drivers
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers
    • 0.29% fail on Speedometer (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Load security (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Loading door (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Hinged tailboard
      • 0.029% fail on Dropside
    • 0.12% fail on Steps and stairs (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Steps (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Retractable steps
    • 0.087% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.087% fail on Spare wheel
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers (18% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers (21% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.89% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (32% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Fuel system (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Tank (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Cap (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on System
      • 0.20% fail on Pipe
      • 0.029% fail on Hose
    • 0.66% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.46% fail on Emissions (63% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Size/type
    • 0.12% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (36% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (93% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (86% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Drivers airbag (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (39% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 4.7% fail on Steering (26% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Steering system (45% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end (43% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack (58% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Free play
        • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
        • 0.087% fail on Steering pivot point
        • 0.058% fail on Steering component
      • 0.087% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.029% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.84% fail on Steering control (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Steering coupling (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Universal joint (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Flexible coupling (15 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Steering column
    • 0.49% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
      • 0.058% fail on Other components
      • 0.029% fail on Pump
      • 0.029% fail on Rams
    • 0.40% fail on Steering operation (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.087% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.058% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.12% fail on Vehicle Identification Number (17 times worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.55% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Attachment
    • 0.058% fail on Condition
  • 0.20% fail on Towbars
    • 0.14% fail on Towbar
    • 0.058% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.029% fail on Driving Controls and Speed Limiters
    • 0.029% fail on Speed limiter plate