MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » IVECO » Daily » 2010

IVECO Daily MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.1% pass rate
from 1,558 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the IVECO Daily is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Direction indicators (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Flashing type (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.0% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.064% fail on Switch
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.064% fail on Switch
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim (43% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.0% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Reversing lamps (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Reversing lamps (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.45% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.45% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
    • 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.13% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 22% fail on Brakes (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.064% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.32% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (95% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (82% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Cable
        • 0.45% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (69% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (66% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.064% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.71% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Prescribed areas (27 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (81 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Other components
    • 0.45% fail on Rigid brake pipes (88% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.064% fail on Leaks
      • 0.064% fail on Servos
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.064% fail on Low pressure warning
      • 0.064% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
    • 0.064% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Suspension arm (22 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.064% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Linkage
      • 0.45% fail on Anti-roll bar (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Springs (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Leaf springs (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Leaf spring (86% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.064% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.064% fail on Spring saddle
        • 0.064% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.19% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.064% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.064% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.8% fail on Sub-frames (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame (17 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Other suspension component (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.64% fail on Wheel bearings (61% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Axles
      • 0.19% fail on Axle (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.064% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.064% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 11% fail on Visibility (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on View to rear
      • 0.90% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.77% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.77% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (87% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Mounting fixings (28 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Body condition (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Panel
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Prop shaft (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Joints
        • 0.26% fail on Flexible couplings (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.064% fail on Bearing housing
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (96% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.064% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Hose (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe
      • 0.064% fail on System
    • 0.90% fail on Doors
      • 0.39% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.32% fail on Door condition
        • 0.064% fail on Catch
      • 0.32% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.32% fail on Door condition
      • 0.26% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
    • 0.58% fail on Bumpers (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Chassis
      • 0.39% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.064% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.26% fail on Floor (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Cabs
      • 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
      • 0.064% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.064% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.13% fail on Load security
      • 0.064% fail on Loading door
      • 0.064% fail on Dropside
        • 0.064% fail on Dropside condition
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.064% fail on Undertray
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.064% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.064% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
      • 0.71% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.83% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.51% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.064% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.064% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (51% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.64% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.064% fail on Attachment
      • 0.064% fail on Requirements
  • 3.5% fail on Steering (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components (38% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.064% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.64% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.64% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.064% fail on Other components
    • 0.19% fail on Steering play
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.96% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.13% fail on Vehicle Identification Number (24 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.77% fail on Road Wheels (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Attachment (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 0.064% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.064% fail on Doors
      • 0.064% fail on Emergency exits
  • 0.064% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.064% fail on Anchorages