Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

IVECO Daily MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.8% pass rate
from 1,764 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the IVECO Daily is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (19% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.9% fail on Direction indicators (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Flashing type (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Individual lamps (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 7.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Front lamps (27% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Rear lamps (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on All position lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Switch (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Horn (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Fog lamp (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.057% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.057% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 1.5% fail on Battery (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Electrical wiring (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.51% fail on Switch
    • 0.40% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.057% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.057% fail on Rear lamps
  • 19% fail on Brakes (57% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Rear wheels (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Front wheels (88% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.057% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.74% fail on Brake calipers (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake back plates (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.3% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (18 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Components (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.74% fail on Hoses (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Pipes (87% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Reservoirs (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.057% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
      • 0.057% fail on Leaks
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Fitment
    • 1.9% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.85% fail on Pedal
        • 0.51% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.34% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Lever (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.11% fail on Locking devices (23 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.057% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
      • 0.057% fail on Warning
    • 0.057% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.057% fail on Components
        • 0.057% fail on Servos
    • 0.057% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.057% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 17% fail on Suspension (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.62% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.40% fail on Attachment
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 5.2% fail on Leaf springs (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Pins and bushes (18 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Shackle (20 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Anchor (14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Other pins and bushes (47 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Securing bolts (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
      • 0.34% fail on Spring eye (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Anchor bracket (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Spring saddle (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Shackle bracket (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Spring slippers
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Front suspension joints (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers (66% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Component mounting (14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Spring mounting (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.74% fail on Sub-frames (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Condition (40 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Attachment
    • 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.34% fail on Front
      • 0.23% fail on Rear
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.057% fail on Air suspension
      • 0.057% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.057% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
    • 0.057% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.057% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.057% fail on Universal joint
  • 9.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.6% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.85% fail on Bonnet (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.057% fail on Glazing
      • 0.057% fail on Glazing/screen/partition
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
    • 0.057% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Requirements
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Passengers other (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Emergency exits (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.40% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Body security
    • 0.11% fail on Steps and stairs (23 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Retractable steps (37 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Load security
      • 0.057% fail on Access panel
      • 0.057% fail on Hinged tailboard
    • 0.057% fail on Spare wheel
  • 3.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (78% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Cap
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
      • 0.11% fail on System
      • 0.057% fail on Tank
    • 0.11% fail on Emissions
    • 0.057% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.3% fail on Steering (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering system (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.057% fail on Free play
        • 0.057% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.057% fail on Other components
        • 0.057% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.057% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.51% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.51% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.23% fail on Driving Controls and Speed Limiters (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Speed limiter plate (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.057% fail on Driving controls
  • 0.057% fail on Towbars
    • 0.057% fail on Towbar