IVECO Daily MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.8% pass rate
from 1,854 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the IVECO Daily is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.4% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.9% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
    • 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim (48% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Switch (24 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps (50% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp (50% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.054% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.054% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.8% fail on Outline marker lamps (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Outline marker lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on All outline marker lamps (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.22% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.22% fail on Switch
    • 0.11% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 18% fail on Brakes (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 10% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (85% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.43% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.054% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (83% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (32% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.6% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Linkage
        • 0.054% fail on Rod
        • 0.054% fail on Relay lever
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake control (93% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Lever
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic parking brake (19 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.76% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.70% fail on Pedal
      • 0.054% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.70% fail on Flexible brake hoses (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (22 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Prescribed areas (48 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (102 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.38% fail on Rigid brake pipes (88% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.054% fail on Reservoirs
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 5.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint (65% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Anti-roll bar (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.5% fail on Springs
      • 3.4% fail on Leaf springs (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Leaf spring (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Spring saddle (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Anchor bracket (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.11% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers (84% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames (14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Sub-frame (30 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (24 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.054% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.76% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.11% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.054% fail on Axles
      • 0.054% fail on Axle
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on View to rear
      • 1.0% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.97% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.65% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame (68 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame condition (68 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Body (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Other body component
      • 0.32% fail on Mounting fixings (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Panel
      • 0.16% fail on Body condition (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Doors (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
    • 0.81% fail on Transmission (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Prop shafts (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Flexible couplings (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Bearing housing
        • 0.054% fail on Joints
    • 0.76% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.32% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on System
      • 0.054% fail on Hose
    • 0.70% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Seats
      • 0.32% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.054% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.22% fail on Load security (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Loading door
      • 0.11% fail on Dropside (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Dropside condition
        • 0.054% fail on Other dropside component
      • 0.054% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.11% fail on Chassis
      • 0.11% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.11% fail on Floor (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Cabs
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Undertray
    • 0.054% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.054% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.054% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.054% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.70% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.054% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.054% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.054% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.97% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.054% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.054% fail on Other emission control equipment
    • 0.76% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.38% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (94% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (84% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Requirements
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Airbags
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (59% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.27% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.054% fail on Steering box
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.054% fail on Steering column
    • 0.054% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.054% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.054% fail on Steering play
      • 0.054% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.70% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.054% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Attachment (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 0.11% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.054% fail on Doors
      • 0.054% fail on Emergency exits
    • 0.054% fail on Passenger grab handles
  • 0.054% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.054% fail on Speed limiter
      • 0.054% fail on Speed limiter plate