Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

LDV Convoy MOT Results

Registered in 1996
64.2% pass rate
from 81 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Convoy is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.4% fail on Rbt
          • 7.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.2% fail on Valves
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.7% fail on Chassis
      • 3.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.5% fail on Spare wheel (33 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Carrier (38 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Body condition
      • 1.2% fail on Panel
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Pipe
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 1.2% fail on Driver's door
        • 1.2% fail on Door condition
    • 1.2% fail on Floor
    • 1.2% fail on Cabs
      • 1.2% fail on Steps
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 7.4% fail on Washers
    • 3.7% fail on View to rear (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Mirrors (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Driver's view
    • 1.2% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.7% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Steering
    • 7.4% fail on Steering linkage components (190% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Drag link end
    • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas (27 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.2% fail on Steering box
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 1.2% fail on Other components
    • 1.2% fail on Steering play
      • 1.2% fail on Steering box
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 8.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.2% fail on Axles
      • 1.2% fail on King pins
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres
    • 1.2% fail on Size/type
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth