LDV Convoy MOT Results
Registered in 199649.5% pass rate
from 111 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Convoy is unusually good or bad.
-
34% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 14% fail on Registration plate lamp (110% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 12% fail on Headlamp aim
- 9.9% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 9.0% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
7.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.6% fail on Individual lamps
- 3.6% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.8% fail on All direction indicators
-
7.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
6.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.4% fail on Front lamps
- 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.6% fail on Electrical wiring (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.7% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.90% fail on Tell tale
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
-
0.90% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.90% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.8% fail on Switch
- 0.90% fail on Lamp
- 0.90% fail on Tell tale
- 0.90% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.90% fail on Rear reflectors
-
31% fail on
Brakes
(65% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
24% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 13% fail on Front wheels (170% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 13% fail on Rear wheels (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 7.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 5.4% fail on Brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Brake performance not tested (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
11% fail on
Components
- 9.0% fail on Pipes
- 0.90% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.90% fail on Servos
- 0.90% fail on Leaks
-
11% fail on
Components
-
3.6% fail on
Hub components
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.90% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
1.8% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.8% fail on
Pedal
- 1.8% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Pedal
-
1.8% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(31 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Operation (114 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
0.90% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.90% fail on Condition
-
0.90% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.90% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
24% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
9.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 8.1% fail on Component mounting
- 1.8% fail on Spring mounting
-
5.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 5.4% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.90% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.90% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.90% fail on Attachment
-
2.7% fail on
Axles
(20 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 2.7% fail on King pins (68 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.7% fail on Condition
-
0.90% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.90% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.90% fail on Front suspension joints
-
9.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
18% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(130% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
8.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
(200% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 8.1% fail on Chassis (200% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 7.2% fail on Body condition
-
5.4% fail on
Seats
(7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Passengers (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Doors
- 2.7% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Body security (9 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
8.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
(200% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
14% fail on
Tyres
(140% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 8.1% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 8.1% fail on Tread depth (170% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 9.0% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 7.2% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Mirrors
- 0.90% fail on Bonnet
-
13% fail on
Steering
(100% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Power steering
(5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.90% fail on Drive system
- 0.90% fail on Other components
-
5.4% fail on
Steering system
- 2.7% fail on Track rod end
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint
- 0.90% fail on Steering box
- 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas (18 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.90% fail on Steering operation
-
6.3% fail on
Power steering
(5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.6% fail on Emissions
-
3.6% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.8% fail on Cap
- 0.90% fail on Tank
- 0.90% fail on System
-
9.9% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
9.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 7.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.8% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Attachment (11 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
9.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.7% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate