MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » LDV » Convoy » 1997

LDV Convoy MOT Results

Registered in 1997
58.3% pass rate
from 163 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Convoy is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (63% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 9.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 8.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 8.6% fail on Rbt
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (99% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 8.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
    • 1.2% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.61% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.61% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.61% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.61% fail on Cable
    • 0.61% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.61% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.61% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.61% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 8.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 3.7% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.61% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.8% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.61% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.61% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.8% fail on Axles (20 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on King pins (31 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Stub axle
  • 15% fail on Visibility
    • 7.4% fail on Wipers
    • 6.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Bonnet
    • 1.2% fail on View to rear
      • 1.2% fail on Mirrors
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Doors (200% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Driver's door
        • 1.2% fail on Door condition
    • 3.7% fail on Seats (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Driver's seat (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Chassis
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Pipe
      • 0.61% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.8% fail on Body
      • 0.61% fail on Body condition
      • 0.61% fail on Panel
      • 0.61% fail on Other body component
    • 1.8% fail on Cabs
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Floor (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Transmission
      • 0.61% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.61% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.61% fail on Load security
      • 0.61% fail on Dropside
        • 0.61% fail on Dropside condition
  • 9.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 9.2% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
      • 0.61% fail on Attachment
      • 0.61% fail on Requirements
  • 7.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.61% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.61% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.61% fail on Other components
        • 0.61% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.61% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.8% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.8% fail on Steering box (31 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 0.61% fail on Operation
      • 0.61% fail on Other components
    • 0.61% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.61% fail on Steering column
    • 0.61% fail on Steering play
      • 0.61% fail on Steering box
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.61% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.61% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.61% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.61% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates