MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » LDV » Convoy » 2000

LDV Convoy MOT Results

Registered in 2000
48.0% pass rate
from 683 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Convoy is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (84% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Headlamps (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Headlamp (99% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Dipswitch (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.15% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 7.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.0% fail on Battery (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on All direction indicators (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.7% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.44% fail on Switch
      • 0.15% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.0% fail on Horn
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (54% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.88% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 27% fail on Brakes (29% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (72% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Front wheels (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Parking brake performance (76% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (77% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.3% fail on Components
        • 6.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.59% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.44% fail on Cylinders (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Valves (85% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Hoses (85% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Leaks
      • 0.59% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.44% fail on Operation
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.44% fail on Brake drums (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.59% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.59% fail on Pedal
        • 0.44% fail on Condition
        • 0.15% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.59% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.59% fail on Cable
    • 0.44% fail on ABS
    • 0.15% fail on Restricted movement
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 9.7% fail on Component mounting (43% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 5.3% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Axles (28 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on King pins (43 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Stub axle (21 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 3.7% fail on Wheel bearings (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Front (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.88% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Leaf springs
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Shackle (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Anchor (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Spring eye
    • 0.15% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 16% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (92% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Body condition (54% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Passengers front (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5) (37 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Emergency exits (20 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Passengers other
    • 3.8% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Passengers (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis
    • 0.29% fail on Steps and stairs (13 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Steps (19 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Body security
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Mirrors (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 12% fail on Seat belts (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Prescribed areas (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (34% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on System (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Cap (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Hose (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Tank
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions
  • 11% fail on Steering (43% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Steering system
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Drag link end (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Steering box (19 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Free play
        • 0.59% fail on Steering box (16 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Steering damper (33 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Other components
        • 0.15% fail on Steering pivot point
        • 0.15% fail on Steering component
      • 0.15% fail on Steering arm
    • 2.6% fail on Power steering (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Operation
      • 0.59% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.44% fail on Pump (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas (15 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Steering control
      • 0.15% fail on Steering column
    • 0.15% fail on Locking devices
  • 9.1% fail on Tyres
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth (52% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.2% fail on Towbars
    • 1.0% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Condition