LDV Convoy MOT Results

Registered in 2000
44.4% pass rate
from 441 tests in 2020
(19% worse than other 2000 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Convoy is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (43% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 10.0% fail on Headlamp aim (95% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Headlamp aim (90% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 9.3% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.1% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Dipswitch (14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Electrical equipment (83% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Horn
      • 0.45% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 6.6% fail on Direction indicators (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Flashing type (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (90% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.68% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 6.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 6.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.68% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.45% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.45% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.23% fail on All outline marker lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.45% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.45% fail on Switch
  • 27% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 23% fail on Brake performance (98% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 11% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 13% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 9.5% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.23% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.45% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 6.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.23% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.91% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.23% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.68% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.45% fail on Cable
        • 0.23% fail on Clevis joint
    • 1.4% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.91% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.23% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.91% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.91% fail on Pedal
    • 0.91% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.45% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.23% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.23% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
    • 0.45% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.45% fail on Lever
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.23% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure (43% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Chassis (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Chassis condition (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.23% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.9% fail on Fuel system (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Pipe
      • 0.68% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.68% fail on System
      • 0.45% fail on Tank
      • 0.45% fail on Hose (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Body (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Panel
      • 0.45% fail on Body condition
      • 0.23% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 2.0% fail on Doors
      • 1.4% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.68% fail on Door condition
    • 2.0% fail on Cabs (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Steps (12 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.6% fail on Floor (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission (74% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.45% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.45% fail on Towbar
      • 0.23% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.23% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.23% fail on Load security
      • 0.23% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.23% fail on Loading door
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.8% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Axles (26 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on King pins (48 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Stub axle (44 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Axle
    • 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage
    • 2.0% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.91% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.68% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.23% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 0.23% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.23% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.23% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.23% fail on Other suspension component
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Washers
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.91% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.68% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.23% fail on Window
  • 11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 11% fail on Seat belts (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Requirements (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment
  • 11% fail on Steering (58% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Drag link end (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
        • 0.23% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.23% fail on Locking devices
    • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Operation
      • 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.23% fail on Pump
      • 0.23% fail on Rams
    • 0.91% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.45% fail on Operation (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Steering box (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Steering column
    • 0.23% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.23% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.23% fail on Steering play
      • 0.23% fail on Steering box
  • 9.1% fail on Tyres (77% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth (93% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Size/type
  • 6.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.68% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 3.2% fail on Fluid leaks (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Other leaks (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.45% fail on Attachment
  • 0.23% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.23% fail on Anchorages