MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » LDV » Convoy » 2000

LDV Convoy MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.6% pass rate
from 233 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Convoy is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.4% fail on Headlamp aim (82% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 6.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 6.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.43% fail on Dipswitch
    • 5.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 5.2% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Horn
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.86% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.86% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (65% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 9.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (200% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 7.3% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 9.4% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.43% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.43% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.86% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.86% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.86% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.86% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.43% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.43% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.86% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.43% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.43% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.43% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.43% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.86% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.86% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.43% fail on Valves
    • 0.43% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.43% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.6% fail on Chassis
      • 5.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 4.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.43% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Driver's door
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition
    • 2.6% fail on Body
      • 1.7% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Panel
      • 0.43% fail on Body condition
    • 2.1% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Passenger's seat (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.86% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.43% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Tank
    • 0.43% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.43% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.43% fail on Carrier
    • 0.43% fail on Floor
    • 0.43% fail on Cabs
      • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 9.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Axles (24 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on King pins (45 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Stub axle (61 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 0.86% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.43% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.43% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.43% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 6.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.43% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
  • 13% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 13% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Requirements
  • 10% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Drag link end (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Other components
        • 0.43% fail on Steering component
    • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas (31 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Steering play (13 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Steering box (45 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering
      • 0.86% fail on Other components
      • 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.43% fail on Pump
    • 0.86% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.86% fail on Steering box (30 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres (81% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.86% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.43% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.86% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.43% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.43% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 2.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plates