LDV Convoy MOT Results
Registered in 200143.9% pass rate
from 1,130 tests in 2017
(10% worse than other 2001 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Convoy is unusually good or bad.
-
37% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(23% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 12% fail on Headlamp aim (83% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 12% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
9.2% fail on
Headlamps
(140% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 9.1% fail on Headlamp (150% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Dipswitch (10 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
0.088% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.088% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.088% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.088% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
7.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.3% fail on Front lamps
- 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.088% fail on All position lamps
-
6.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(41% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Fog lamp (45% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Tell tale
- 0.18% fail on Switch
- 5.8% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.88% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.18% fail on Tell tales
- 0.18% fail on Switch
-
5.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.4% fail on Horn (52% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (48% better than other 2001 vans)
- 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
0.62% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.35% fail on Lamp
- 0.27% fail on Switch
- 0.088% fail on Tell tale
- 0.44% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.44% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.27% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.18% fail on
Outline marker lamps
(11 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.088% fail on Front lamps
- 0.088% fail on Rear lamps
-
29% fail on
Brakes
(30% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(66% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 12% fail on Rear wheels (110% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 11% fail on Front wheels (120% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 9.4% fail on Parking brake performance (60% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (71% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Brake imbalance (170% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.18% fail on Brake operation
-
9.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.6% fail on
Components
- 5.9% fail on Pipes
- 1.5% fail on Hoses
- 1.2% fail on Valves (65% better than other 2001 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Cylinders (6 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.71% fail on Leaks
- 0.44% fail on Operation
- 0.088% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
8.6% fail on
Components
-
3.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake discs
- 0.35% fail on Brake drums (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.18% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.2% fail on
Pedal
- 0.62% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Anti-slip
-
1.2% fail on
Pedal
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.88% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.62% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.088% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.44% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.44% fail on Cable
- 0.44% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.18% fail on ABS
-
0.088% fail on
Full power hydraulic systems
- 0.088% fail on Warning
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(66% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
21% fail on
Suspension
-
10% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 8.5% fail on Component mounting (36% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.088% fail on Subframe mounting
-
6.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 6.1% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Axles
(23 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 4.8% fail on King pins (32 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Stub axle (15 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.088% fail on Clearance
-
3.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 3.4% fail on Front (75% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Rear
-
3.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
- 0.088% fail on Linkage condition
-
1.9% fail on
Leaf springs
-
1.6% fail on
Pins and bushes
(2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Shackle (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Anchor (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Spring eye
- 0.18% fail on Securing bolts
-
1.6% fail on
Pins and bushes
(2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
0.27% fail on
Suspension arms
(94% better than other 2001 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2001 vans)
-
10% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
16% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(91% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 7.8% fail on Body condition (76% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.80% fail on Emergency exits (25 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Passengers other
- 0.088% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5)
-
3.9% fail on
Seats
(4 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Drivers (4 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Passengers (8 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 3.3% fail on Chassis
- 0.88% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
0.27% fail on
Load security
- 0.088% fail on Access panel
- 0.088% fail on Loading door
- 0.088% fail on Hinged tailboard
-
0.18% fail on
Steps and stairs
(13 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Steps (15 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.088% fail on Speedometer
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.9% fail on Wipers
- 5.4% fail on Washers
- 2.5% fail on Mirrors (110% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.97% fail on Windscreen
-
14% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(78% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Fuel system
(3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 3.5% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Pipe (9 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.97% fail on Cap
- 0.80% fail on Tank
- 0.44% fail on Hose (9 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested (160% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Emissions
-
7.2% fail on
Fuel system
(3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
14% fail on
Steering
(77% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
9.7% fail on
Steering system
(50% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 5.6% fail on Track rod end
- 1.8% fail on Steering box (21 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Drag link end (8 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Free play
(5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Steering box (31 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Steering damper (36 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
- 0.27% fail on Steering arm
-
0.088% fail on
Other components
- 0.088% fail on Steering pivot point
- 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas (25 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Power steering
(110% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.88% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.80% fail on Other components (170% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Operation
- 0.18% fail on Pump
- 0.088% fail on Rams
- 0.27% fail on Steering operation
-
0.088% fail on
Steering control
-
0.088% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.088% fail on Universal joint
-
0.088% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.088% fail on Locking devices
-
9.7% fail on
Steering system
(50% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
12% fail on
Tyres
(51% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Tread depth (70% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Size/type
- 0.088% fail on Valve stem
-
12% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(110% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
12% fail on
Seat belts
(150% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Prescribed areas (120% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
12% fail on
Seat belts
(150% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
- 0.088% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
1.1% fail on
Towbars
(130% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.97% fail on Vehicle structure (180% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Towbar
-
0.62% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
- 0.088% fail on Hubs
- 0.088% fail on Condition
-
0.35% fail on
Driving Controls and Speed Limiters
(14 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Driving controls (15 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Speed limiter plate (13 times worse than other 2001 vans)