MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » LDV » Convoy » 2004

LDV Convoy MOT Results

Registered in 2004
51.0% pass rate
from 559 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Convoy is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.2% fail on Headlamps (82% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Dipswitch
    • 8.2% fail on Headlamp aim (96% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim (86% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Electrical equipment (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Horn
      • 0.54% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.36% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.18% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 23% fail on Brakes (25% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (51% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 9.7% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 9.3% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 7.3% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 7.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 7.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.18% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.89% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.72% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.18% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.36% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.18% fail on Cable
        • 0.18% fail on Lever
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.18% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Brake fluid (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Valves
    • 0.89% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Other braking system component (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.72% fail on Pedal
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.54% fail on Lever
    • 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Chassis
      • 3.6% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.18% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.3% fail on Body (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Panel (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Other body component
      • 0.18% fail on Body condition
    • 2.1% fail on Doors (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Hinge
      • 0.89% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.72% fail on Door condition
        • 0.18% fail on Catch
      • 0.18% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.18% fail on Door condition
    • 1.8% fail on Cabs (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Steps (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on Tank
      • 0.54% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
    • 0.89% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Transmission
      • 0.18% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.18% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.18% fail on Floor
  • 14% fail on Visibility (41% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 6.3% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Bonnet (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.36% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.36% fail on Windscreen
  • 13% fail on Suspension (38% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.0% fail on Axles (20 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on King pins (152 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Stub axle
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.72% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Leaf spring
      • 0.89% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (77% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage ball joints (81% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.54% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 9.5% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.54% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.36% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.18% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.18% fail on Other components
        • 0.18% fail on Steering component
    • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas (40 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 1.1% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Steering box (19 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering column
  • 7.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (66% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Seat belts (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Requirements
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
  • 3.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.36% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.36% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.72% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.36% fail on Attachment
  • 0.18% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Emergency exits