LDV Convoy MOT Results
Registered in 200550.1% pass rate
from 549 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Convoy is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(38% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
8.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
(110% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 7.8% fail on Headlamp aim (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
7.8% fail on
Headlamps
(93% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 7.8% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Dipswitch
-
7.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(150% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(150% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Switch
-
7.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(150% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Horn
- 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
-
5.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.18% fail on Switch
-
5.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.36% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.18% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.18% fail on Position lamp
-
0.18% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.18% fail on Switch
-
0.18% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
8.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
(110% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
25% fail on
Brakes
(40% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
(78% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
10% fail on
Service brake performance
(160% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
10% fail on
Rbt
(160% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 8.4% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
10% fail on
Rbt
(160% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
10% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
10% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
10% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 7.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.18% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
- 0.73% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
10% fail on
Service brake performance
(160% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.2% fail on Brake discs
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.18% fail on Brake linings
-
0.36% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.36% fail on Cable
-
2.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
2.4% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(170% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Brake fluid (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.18% fail on Valves
-
0.91% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.91% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.55% fail on Other braking system component (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.91% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.55% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Servos (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.18% fail on Leaks
-
0.55% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.55% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.36% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.36% fail on Lever
- 0.36% fail on Load sensing valves
- 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
(78% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(27% better than other 2005 vans)
- 8.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (54% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Axles
(27 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.1% fail on King pins (161 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.55% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Stub axle (90 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.1% fail on
Springs
(72% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.73% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.55% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
- 0.18% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
- 0.36% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.73% fail on
Leaf springs
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(82% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.55% fail on Linkage
- 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.36% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.73% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.36% fail on Other suspension component (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Suspension arms
(95% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.18% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.18% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 4.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
3.3% fail on
Chassis
- 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.5% fail on
Transmission
(68% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Prop shafts
- 1.1% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.18% fail on Joints
- 0.18% fail on Flexible couplings
-
1.5% fail on
Prop shafts
-
1.5% fail on
Seats
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.91% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.73% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
-
0.91% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.91% fail on Door condition
-
0.18% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
-
0.91% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
1.1% fail on
Cabs
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.73% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.36% fail on Steps (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.91% fail on
Body
- 0.55% fail on Other body component
- 0.18% fail on Body condition
- 0.18% fail on Panel
- 0.73% fail on Exhaust system (78% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.73% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.55% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.18% fail on Tank
- 0.36% fail on Floor
- 0.18% fail on Bumpers
-
0.18% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.18% fail on Carrier
-
4.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
13% fail on
Steering
(96% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 4.9% fail on Track rod end
- 1.5% fail on Drag link end (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Other components
(15 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Steering component
- 0.18% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.18% fail on Steering arm
- 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas (57 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Operation
- 0.18% fail on Pump
- 0.18% fail on Rams
-
1.5% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.3% fail on Steering box (41 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Operation
-
1.5% fail on
Steering play
(5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Steering box (37 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Steering coupling
(17 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Universal joint (19 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Steering column
-
6.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
12% fail on
Visibility
- 7.1% fail on Wipers
- 5.1% fail on Washers
- 1.6% fail on Bonnet (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
View to rear
- 1.5% fail on Mirrors
-
0.55% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.55% fail on Windscreen
-
7.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(67% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
7.8% fail on
Seat belts
(180% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.55% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
7.8% fail on
Seat belts
(180% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
7.7% fail on
Tyres
- 5.5% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition
-
4.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.5% fail on
Compression ignition
- 2.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.36% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.55% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.18% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.18% fail on Other leaks
-
3.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.73% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.73% fail on Attachment
-
0.36% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.36% fail on Registration plates
-
0.36% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
(15 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Doors
(18 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Emergency exits (24 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Doors
(18 times worse than other 2005 vans)