LDV Convoy MOT Results

Registered in 2005
49.6% pass rate
from 1,140 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Convoy is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 12% fail on Headlamp aim (86% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Front lamps (36% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.26% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.0% fail on Battery (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamps (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp (72% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Switch
      • 0.088% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp (35% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Side repeaters (84% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.61% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Horn
    • 0.61% fail on Trailer electrical socket (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.18% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Lamp
    • 0.088% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 24% fail on Brakes (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (72% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.6% fail on Rear wheels (92% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.0% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Parking brake performance (45% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.088% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.6% fail on Components
        • 4.5% fail on Pipes
        • 1.1% fail on Reservoirs (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Valves
        • 0.35% fail on Hoses
        • 0.088% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.088% fail on Pump
      • 0.61% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.53% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Leaks
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.088% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.088% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on ABS
    • 0.88% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.88% fail on Pedal
        • 0.44% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.61% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.53% fail on Cable
      • 0.088% fail on Lever
    • 0.44% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.18% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.18% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.18% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.18% fail on Components (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.088% fail on Servos
        • 0.088% fail on Valves
  • 14% fail on Steering (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 12% fail on Steering system (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Track rod end (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Steering box (39 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Drag link end (14 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Free play (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Steering box (53 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Steering pivot point (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Steering component (24 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.088% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.53% fail on Steering damper (91 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Steering arm (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.1% fail on Power steering (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Other components (200% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Operation
      • 0.26% fail on Pump (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (49 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.26% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering control
      • 0.088% fail on Steering shaft
      • 0.088% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.088% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 14% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.4% fail on Component mounting (64% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.26% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.6% fail on Axles (61 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on King pins (137 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Stub axle (87 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.088% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.6% fail on Front
      • 0.26% fail on Rear
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.79% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.088% fail on Attachment
      • 0.088% fail on Presence
    • 1.1% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Shackle
        • 0.35% fail on Anchor (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Condition
      • 0.088% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.088% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.088% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.088% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.088% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.088% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.088% fail on Universal joint
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road (22% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers (31% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Bonnet (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
  • 13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Body condition (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Emergency exits (32 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5) (45 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.44% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.26% fail on Drivers
    • 2.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis
    • 1.5% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Passengers (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Body security (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Steps and stairs (41 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Steps (54 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.088% fail on Spare wheel
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 11% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
      • 0.088% fail on Installation check
        • 0.088% fail on Anchorage's
  • 10% fail on Tyres (28% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Tread depth (65% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Size/type
    • 0.088% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.9% fail on Emissions
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.88% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Cap
      • 0.35% fail on System
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system (71% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.79% fail on Towbars (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.61% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.18% fail on Driving Controls and Speed Limiters (14 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Speed limiter plate (14 times worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.088% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.088% fail on Condition