LDV Pilot MOT Results

Registered in 1997
61.3% pass rate
from 106 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Pilot is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Battery
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.94% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.94% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.9% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Horn
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 13% fail on Rear wheels (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 6.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 8.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.5% fail on Components
        • 6.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.94% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.94% fail on Valves
    • 2.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.94% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.94% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.94% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.6% fail on Component mounting
      • 4.7% fail on Spring mounting
    • 7.5% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear
    • 5.7% fail on Axles (24 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on King pins (27 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Stub axle
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.94% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.94% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.94% fail on Shackle
    • 0.94% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.94% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.94% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.94% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.94% fail on Universal joint
  • 10% fail on Steering
    • 7.5% fail on Steering system
      • 5.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 3.8% fail on Drag link end (14 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Free play
        • 0.94% fail on Steering box
    • 1.9% fail on Power steering
      • 0.94% fail on Operation
      • 0.94% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 1997 vans)
  • 10% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.7% fail on Body condition
    • 3.8% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Passengers front (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Drivers
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis
    • 1.9% fail on Seats
      • 0.94% fail on Passengers
      • 0.94% fail on Drivers
    • 0.94% fail on Engine mountings
  • 9.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.7% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on System
      • 1.9% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Hose
      • 0.94% fail on Cap
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.94% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 7.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.8% fail on Requirements (9 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition
  • 7.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers