Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2001
63.7% pass rate
from 742 tests in 2017
(29% better than other 2001 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (23% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 10% fail on Fog lamp (150% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Tell tale (4 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Position lamps (32% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.94% fail on Rear lamps (71% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (56% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp (54% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.1% fail on Battery
    • 0.54% fail on Direction indicators (87% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Flashing type (87% better than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Individual lamps (80% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Horn (82% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Suspension (45% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas (75% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Component mounting (66% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Subframe mounting (77% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Spring mounting (94% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.40% fail on Drive shafts (89% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Front drive shafts (89% better than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Constant velocity joints (89% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers (84% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 6.9% fail on Driver's view of the road (44% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (61% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Emissions (160% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system (70% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.27% fail on Fuel system (84% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Cap
  • 4.7% fail on Brakes (79% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Brake performance (85% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Front wheels (84% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance (82% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Rear wheels (90% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.67% fail on ABS
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic systems (97% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Components
        • 0.13% fail on Pipes
    • 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
  • 3.4% fail on Steering (56% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Steering system (54% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.27% fail on Steering rack (82% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.27% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Rams
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres (61% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (70% better than other 2001 vans)
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (76% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Seat belts (80% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Prescribed areas (81% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Requirements
    • 0.40% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.40% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (84% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Body condition (82% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Vehicle structure (80% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Chassis (80% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Body security
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers front
  • 0.67% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.54% fail on Towbars
    • 0.54% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Condition