Mazda Bongo MOT Results
Registered in 200465.6% pass rate
from 291 tests in 2017
(33% better than other 2004 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(30% better than other 2004 vans)
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 11% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Switch (20 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
5.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.1% fail on Front lamps
- 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (70% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.34% fail on Battery
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(53% better than other 2004 vans)
-
5.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 3.4% fail on Front suspension joints
-
3.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.69% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.69% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.69% fail on Front
-
0.69% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.69% fail on Condition
-
0.34% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.34% fail on Component mounting
- 0.34% fail on Subframe mounting
-
5.5% fail on
Suspension arms
-
7.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.5% fail on Wipers
- 2.1% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Windscreen
-
3.4% fail on
Brakes
(83% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Hub components
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
-
1.0% fail on
Brake performance
(91% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.69% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.34% fail on Front wheels
- 0.34% fail on Restricted movement
-
2.1% fail on
Hub components
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
(63% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 1.0% fail on Tread depth (80% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.69% fail on Size/type
- 0.34% fail on Valve stem
-
2.7% fail on
Steering
(61% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Steering system
(59% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Track rod end
-
0.34% fail on
Power steering
- 0.34% fail on Other components
-
2.4% fail on
Steering system
(59% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(57% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.4% fail on Cap (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Emissions
- 0.69% fail on Exhaust system (82% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
-
1.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(73% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Body condition
-
1.0% fail on
Doors
- 0.69% fail on Passengers front
- 0.34% fail on Drivers
-
1.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(81% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts
(73% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Requirements
- 0.34% fail on Condition
- 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts
(73% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.69% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.69% fail on Registration plate