Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2004
65.6% pass rate
from 291 tests in 2017
(33% better than other 2004 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (30% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 11% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Switch (20 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (70% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.34% fail on Battery
  • 12% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.69% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.69% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.69% fail on Front
    • 0.69% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.69% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.34% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.34% fail on Subframe mounting
  • 7.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.4% fail on Brakes (83% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.0% fail on Brake performance (91% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.34% fail on Front wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Restricted movement
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (63% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Tread depth (80% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Size/type
    • 0.34% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.7% fail on Steering (61% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Steering system (59% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.34% fail on Power steering
      • 0.34% fail on Other components
  • 2.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (57% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on Cap (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Emissions
    • 0.69% fail on Exhaust system (82% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 1.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (73% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.69% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.34% fail on Drivers
  • 1.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (81% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts (73% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Requirements
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
      • 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.69% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.69% fail on Registration plate