Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2004
65.5% pass rate
from 432 tests in 2020
(32% better than other 2004 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (25% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 9.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 9.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Switch (15 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.69% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (51% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Electrical equipment (75% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (91% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 9.0% fail on Suspension (60% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.93% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.93% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.69% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (85% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 6.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.93% fail on Washers (81% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.23% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.8% fail on Spark ignition (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.4% fail on Brakes (77% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance (84% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.46% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (92% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (sp) (92% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
    • 0.46% fail on Rigid brake pipes (92% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth (57% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 2.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (81% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Doors
      • 0.46% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition
      • 0.46% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition
    • 0.69% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.69% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.69% fail on Exhaust system (81% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Seats
      • 0.46% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.23% fail on Undertray
  • 2.3% fail on Steering (67% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Steering linkage components (55% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.46% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (91% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Seat belts (86% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Requirements
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
  • 0.23% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.23% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.23% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.23% fail on Anchorages