Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2006
63.5% pass rate
from 137 tests in 2020
(27% better than other 2006 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Switch (31 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.73% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.8% fail on Suspension (57% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.73% fail on Linkage
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.73% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.73% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.73% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.73% fail on Washers
  • 5.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.2% fail on Chassis
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.2% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Seats
      • 1.5% fail on Passenger's seat (9 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.73% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.73% fail on Body
      • 0.73% fail on Other body component
    • 0.73% fail on Doors
      • 0.73% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.73% fail on Door condition
  • 5.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.1% fail on Spark ignition (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (14 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.73% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (84% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.73% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.73% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.73% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.73% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.73% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.73% fail on Service brake performance
  • 0.73% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.73% fail on Steering
    • 0.73% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.73% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.73% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.73% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.73% fail on Condition