Mercedes-Benz Vito MOT Results
Registered in 200242.9% pass rate
from 2,175 tests in 2017
(10% worse than other 2002 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz Vito is unusually good or bad.
-
35% fail on
Suspension
(39% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
18% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
17% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 17% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Couplings (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.046% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.41% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
17% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
14% fail on
Prescribed areas
(63% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 8.1% fail on Component mounting (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.6% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Spring mounting (41% better than other 2002 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.69% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.28% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
- 0.046% fail on Presence
-
4.0% fail on
Coil springs
(67% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.092% fail on Location
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(27% better than other 2002 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (25% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.046% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.97% fail on
Shock absorbers
(48% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.97% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.69% fail on
Wheel bearings
(73% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.55% fail on Front (72% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Rear (73% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.28% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.092% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.092% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.092% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.092% fail on Condition
-
0.046% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
18% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
33% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 12% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
9.0% fail on
Headlamps
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 8.9% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.046% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.046% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.046% fail on Dipswitch
- 7.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
7.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.4% fail on Front lamps
- 2.3% fail on Rear lamps (31% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.092% fail on All position lamps
-
7.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(74% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Flashing type
(74% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.64% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.046% fail on Tell tales
-
7.3% fail on
Flashing type
(74% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Horn
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(60% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Fog lamp (64% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Tell tale
- 0.14% fail on Switch
-
0.92% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.64% fail on Switch
- 0.37% fail on Lamp
- 0.092% fail on Tell tale
- 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.092% fail on Battery (94% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.092% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.046% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
26% fail on
Brakes
(18% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(40% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 14% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.0% fail on Front wheels (31% better than other 2002 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.51% fail on Brake imbalance (54% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.046% fail on Brake operation
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
10% fail on
Components
- 6.2% fail on Pipes
- 2.8% fail on Hoses (89% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Valves (30% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.092% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.69% fail on Leaks
- 0.28% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.092% fail on Operation
-
10% fail on
Components
-
3.3% fail on
Hub components
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
- 0.046% fail on Brake linings
- 0.046% fail on Brake back plates
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake
(84% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Condition (84% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.60% fail on ABS
-
0.32% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.32% fail on Cable
- 0.23% fail on Electronic stability system (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake control components
(73% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.18% fail on
Pedal
(73% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.046% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.18% fail on
Pedal
(73% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.092% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.046% fail on Warning
-
0.046% fail on
Components
- 0.046% fail on Servos
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(40% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.9% fail on Wipers
- 4.3% fail on Washers
- 2.3% fail on Mirrors (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
- 0.092% fail on Bonnet
-
13% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(71% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.9% fail on Body condition (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Vehicle structure
(42% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Chassis (42% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Doors
(100% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.97% fail on Drivers (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Passengers front
- 0.69% fail on Passengers other (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.32% fail on
Seats
- 0.23% fail on Passengers
- 0.092% fail on Drivers
- 0.092% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.092% fail on
Load security
- 0.046% fail on Tailgate
- 0.046% fail on Loading door
- 0.046% fail on Body security
- 0.046% fail on Spare wheel
-
9.8% fail on
Tyres
(20% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.1% fail on Tread depth
- 4.0% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Size/type
- 0.046% fail on Valve stem
-
9.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(76% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
9.0% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.8% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Attachment
- 0.092% fail on Requirements
-
0.60% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(54% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.60% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (51% better than other 2002 vans)
-
9.0% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.1% fail on Exhaust system (37% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Emissions
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.64% fail on System
- 0.46% fail on Cap
- 0.046% fail on Tank
- 0.046% fail on Pipe
- 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.8% fail on
Steering
(23% better than other 2002 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Steering system
- 4.0% fail on Track rod end
- 0.92% fail on Steering rack
- 0.32% fail on Steering arm
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint
-
0.046% fail on
Free play
- 0.046% fail on Steering rack
-
0.23% fail on
Steering control
- 0.18% fail on Steering lock (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.046% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.23% fail on Steering operation
-
0.18% fail on
Power steering
(80% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.092% fail on Other components
- 0.046% fail on Drive system
- 0.046% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.046% fail on Locking devices
-
5.2% fail on
Steering system
-
1.9% fail on
Towbars
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.092% fail on Towbar
-
1.6% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate
- 0.046% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.87% fail on
Road Wheels
(130% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.74% fail on Attachment (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Condition