Mercedes-Benz Vito MOT Results
Registered in 200350.5% pass rate
from 1,064 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz Vito is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(73% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
14% fail on
Transmission
(180% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 13% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.094% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.47% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.47% fail on Joints
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(80% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (82% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
5.3% fail on
Chassis
(95% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Chassis condition (90% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Strengthening plate (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.6% fail on
Doors
(170% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Driver's door
(3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.75% fail on
Front passenger's door
(170% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.75% fail on Door condition (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.66% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.56% fail on Door condition
- 0.094% fail on Catch
-
1.3% fail on
Driver's door
(3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Body
- 0.47% fail on Panel
- 0.47% fail on Other body component
- 0.094% fail on Body condition
- 0.094% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.75% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.47% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.19% fail on Hose
- 0.094% fail on Pipe
-
0.56% fail on
Seats
- 0.38% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.19% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.38% fail on
Towbar
(4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Vehicle structure (14 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Coupling
-
0.28% fail on
Cabs
- 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.19% fail on Bumpers
-
0.19% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.094% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.094% fail on Bracket
-
0.094% fail on
Load security
- 0.094% fail on Loading door
-
0.094% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.094% fail on Other boot lid component
-
14% fail on
Transmission
(180% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(22% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
7.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(38% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (74% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint (200% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.85% fail on Linkage
- 0.85% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.094% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.094% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.094% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.4% fail on Ball joint
- 0.66% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.094% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.094% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.5% fail on
Springs
-
4.0% fail on
Coil springs
(80% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Coil spring (83% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
4.0% fail on
Coil springs
(80% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings (58% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.38% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.094% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.094% fail on Ball joint
-
0.094% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.094% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.094% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.094% fail on Ball joint
-
24% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.8% fail on
Headlamps
(72% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 7.2% fail on Headlamp (86% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.094% fail on Dipswitch
-
6.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(66% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
6.1% fail on
Flashing type
(66% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 4.7% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.28% fail on All direction indicators
-
6.1% fail on
Flashing type
(66% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.66% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.7% fail on Horn
- 0.094% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.094% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.094% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(46% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(46% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (46% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Switch
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(46% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Position lamps
(150% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Position lamp (180% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.38% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.38% fail on Switch
- 0.094% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.094% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.094% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
7.8% fail on
Headlamps
(72% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
23% fail on
Brakes
(21% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(41% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
4.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.094% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.094% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.28% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.19% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.094% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.094% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
- 0.66% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.1% fail on Brake discs
- 0.094% fail on Brake drums
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
-
0.38% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.19% fail on Cable
- 0.094% fail on Lever
- 0.094% fail on Pivot
-
2.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
1.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(140% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Electronic stability control (8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Electronic braking system
- 1.4% fail on Load sensing valves
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake control
(130% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Lever (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.85% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.56% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.38% fail on Hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Pedal
-
0.38% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.38% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.19% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.19% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.094% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.094% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.19% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.094% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.094% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(41% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 5.7% fail on Wipers
- 4.5% fail on Washers
-
1.4% fail on
View to rear
(140% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Mirrors (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.66% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.66% fail on Windscreen
- 0.28% fail on Bonnet
- 0.094% fail on Driver's view
-
7.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(49% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Seat belts
(100% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on Requirements
- 0.094% fail on Attachment
- 0.75% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2003 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Seat belts
(100% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 0.38% fail on Size/type
-
6.2% fail on
Steering
-
4.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 4.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.094% fail on Ball joint
- 0.094% fail on Steering arm
-
1.5% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.4% fail on Steering rack
- 0.094% fail on Operation
- 0.19% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.094% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.094% fail on
Power steering
- 0.094% fail on Other components
-
0.094% fail on
Steering play
- 0.094% fail on Steering rack
-
4.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.56% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (67% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.19% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.19% fail on Catalytic converter (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.094% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.094% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.56% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.19% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.094% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.56% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.28% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.28% fail on Other leaks
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.85% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.85% fail on Registration plates
-
0.66% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.66% fail on Attachment