Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
43.1% pass rate
from 72 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Suspension
    • 22% fail on Prescribed areas (85% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 14% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 13% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.4% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 8.3% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 6.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 1.4% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 5.6% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage condition
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.8% fail on Leaf springs
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Shackle (15 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 8.3% fail on Fog lamp
    • 5.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.4% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Horn
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.4% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 1.4% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.4% fail on Lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  • 26% fail on Brakes
    • 18% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.7% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 6.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Brake performance not tested (9 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.3% fail on Components
        • 5.6% fail on Pipes
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
        • 1.4% fail on Valves
      • 2.8% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (16 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 22% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 21% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 11% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Other components (23 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Steering pivot point (29 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Drag link end
      • 1.4% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.4% fail on Steering operation
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 1.4% fail on Operation
  • 18% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (110% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Body condition
    • 6.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 6.9% fail on Chassis
    • 1.4% fail on Seats
      • 1.4% fail on Drivers
    • 1.4% fail on Spare wheel
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.8% fail on Emissions
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on Cap
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Condition
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.4% fail on Towbars
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate