Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
55.6% pass rate
from 54 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 9.3% fail on Body (7 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Panel (11 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Other body component
    • 5.6% fail on Chassis
      • 5.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.7% fail on Transmission
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.9% fail on Tank
    • 1.9% fail on Spare wheel
      • 1.9% fail on Carrier
    • 1.9% fail on Floor
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 5.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.9% fail on Springs
      • 1.9% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.9% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.9% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Decelerometer
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 1.9% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.9% fail on Pedal
    • 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 7.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
  • 7.4% fail on Steering
    • 5.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.9% fail on Drag link end
      • 1.9% fail on Lock stop
    • 1.9% fail on Steering play
      • 1.9% fail on Steering box
  • 7.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 1.9% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.9% fail on Attachment