Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 1996
44.0% pass rate
from 75 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 17% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 17% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 17% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.7% fail on Hazard warning
      • 2.7% fail on Switch
    • 2.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.7% fail on Horn
      • 1.3% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 29% fail on Body, chassis, structure (81% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Chassis
      • 9.3% fail on Chassis condition (170% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 8.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 8.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 8.0% fail on Body (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Panel (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Other body component
      • 1.3% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 4.0% fail on Transmission
      • 4.0% fail on Prop shafts
        • 2.7% fail on Joints (15 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Prop shaft
    • 4.0% fail on Floor (21 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Bumpers (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Pipe
    • 1.3% fail on Spare wheel
      • 1.3% fail on Carrier
    • 1.3% fail on Boot lid
      • 1.3% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Springs (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Leaf springs (15 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (25 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (18 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Leaf spring
        • 1.3% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 6.7% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.3% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 19% fail on Brake performance
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 11% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 2.7% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.3% fail on Other braking system component
  • 19% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 17% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 11% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint (9 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Other components (36 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage (66 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Drag link end
      • 1.3% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 2.7% fail on Power steering
      • 2.7% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering play
      • 1.3% fail on Steering box
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.3% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 2.7% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 2.7% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 1.3% fail on Belt(s)/padding