MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mitsubishi » L200 » 1996

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 1996
50.0% pass rate
from 34 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 15% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 15% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 12% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on All direction indicators
    • 8.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 8.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 8.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 5.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.9% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 2.9% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Hazard warning
      • 2.9% fail on Switch
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 26% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.8% fail on Body (9 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Panel (11 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 2.9% fail on Other body component
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.9% fail on Fuel system (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Tank
      • 2.9% fail on Pipe
    • 5.9% fail on Transmission
      • 2.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.9% fail on Joints
      • 2.9% fail on Prop shafts
        • 2.9% fail on Joints
    • 2.9% fail on Chassis
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.9% fail on Bumpers
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 8.8% fail on Rbt
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.9% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (25 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Prescribed areas (30 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 2.9% fail on Other braking system component
    • 2.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.9% fail on Brake fluid
    • 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 8.8% fail on Springs (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Leaf springs
        • 2.9% fail on Leaf spring
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 12% fail on Steering
    • 12% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.9% fail on Intermediate drop arm
  • 8.8% fail on Visibility
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.9% fail on Condition
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth