MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mitsubishi » L200 » 1998
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 1998
48.5% pass rate
from 404 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Position lamps (100% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Front lamps (120% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Rear lamps (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 10% fail on Fog lamp (150% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Tell tale
    • 9.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Rear reflectors (9 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.50% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.25% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.2% fail on Battery
    • 2.0% fail on Horn
    • 0.99% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.25% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 27% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 9.2% fail on Component mounting
      • 6.2% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 8.2% fail on Leaf springs (7 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Shackle (10 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Anchor (14 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Shackle bracket (13 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 6.4% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Fitment
    • 5.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.25% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.50% fail on Attachment
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front
      • 0.25% fail on Rear
    • 0.25% fail on General condition
    • 0.25% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Hydraulic systems (54% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 13% fail on Components (43% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 11% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Hoses
        • 1.2% fail on Reservoirs (4 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Valves
      • 2.2% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (5 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Leaks
      • 0.50% fail on Operation
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.50% fail on Brake operation (6 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.50% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.25% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.74% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.74% fail on Condition
    • 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.25% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal
        • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.25% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (47% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Body condition (92% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.5% fail on Chassis
    • 0.74% fail on Body security
    • 0.50% fail on Doors
      • 0.50% fail on Drivers
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.4% fail on Exhaust system (56% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on System
      • 0.50% fail on Cap
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.50% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.50% fail on Mirrors
  • 10% fail on Steering (66% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 9.4% fail on Steering system (89% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Other components (15 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Steering pivot point (16 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.25% fail on Free play
        • 0.25% fail on Steering box
      • 0.25% fail on Lock stop
      • 0.25% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.99% fail on Power steering
      • 0.99% fail on Operation
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
    • 0.25% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.50% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.25% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.25% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.50% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment
  • 0.25% fail on Towbars
    • 0.25% fail on Vehicle structure