Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results
Registered in 199856.2% pass rate
from 178 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
6.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 6.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
6.2% fail on
Chassis
- 6.2% fail on Chassis condition
- 6.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
6.2% fail on
Transmission
-
4.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.5% fail on Joints
-
1.7% fail on
Prop shafts
- 1.1% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.56% fail on Bearing housing
-
4.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.4% fail on
Body
(2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Panel (4 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Other body component
-
1.7% fail on
Cabs
- 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.56% fail on Pipe
- 0.56% fail on Bumpers
-
0.56% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.56% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
6.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
6.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
6.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.56% fail on Dipswitch
-
3.9% fail on
Position lamps
(8 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Position lamp (8 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.56% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.8% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.56% fail on Switch
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.56% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
19% fail on
Suspension
- 7.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
6.7% fail on
Springs
(180% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
5.6% fail on
Leaf springs
(7 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Leaf spring (6 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Shackle bracket (21 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
5.6% fail on
Leaf springs
(7 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.4% fail on Ball joint
-
3.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.56% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.56% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.56% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.56% fail on Ball joint
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
7.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt
- 5.6% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.56% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.56% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt
-
3.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.56% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.56% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.2% fail on
Service brake performance
- 6.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
-
0.56% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.56% fail on Brake discs
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.1% fail on Pedal
- 1.1% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.56% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.56% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
7.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.3% fail on
Steering
-
6.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(130% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Track rod end
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Intermediate drop arm (45 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Drag link end
-
0.56% fail on
Other components
- 0.56% fail on Steering linkage
-
1.1% fail on
Steering play
- 1.1% fail on Steering box (21 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.56% fail on Steering box
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
- 0.56% fail on Other components
-
6.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(130% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Visibility
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers
-
0.56% fail on
View to rear
- 0.56% fail on Mirrors
-
3.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
- 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.56% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
3.4% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.56% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.56% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.8% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 2.8% fail on Registration plates
-
2.8% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 0.56% fail on Size/type