Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
51.9% pass rate
from 1,080 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Position lamps (62% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Front lamps (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 9.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Fog lamp (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.093% fail on Switch
    • 8.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.093% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.093% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 3.4% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.56% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Horn (57% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Trailer electrical socket (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.46% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.37% fail on Lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
    • 0.093% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 7.6% fail on Leaf springs (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Shackle (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Anchor (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Anchor bracket (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Shackle bracket (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.093% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.093% fail on Securing bolts
    • 7.4% fail on Prescribed areas (32% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.9% fail on Spring mounting (56% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Subframe mounting (78% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (60% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Attachment
    • 5.4% fail on Drive shafts (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Front drive shafts (53% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (55% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.093% fail on Universal joint
    • 4.8% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (47% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (46% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.8% fail on Front
    • 0.28% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
      • 0.093% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Axles
      • 0.19% fail on Axle beam (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Clearance
    • 0.19% fail on General condition (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 10% fail on Components
        • 7.5% fail on Pipes (39% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Valves
        • 0.56% fail on Hoses (72% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.093% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.93% fail on Leaks
      • 0.65% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
    • 10% fail on Brake performance (21% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Rear wheels (48% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.74% fail on Brake performance not tested (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.28% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.093% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.093% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
        • 0.93% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.65% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake (70% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (59% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Body condition (59% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Vehicle structure (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Chassis (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Body security (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Seats
      • 0.28% fail on Passengers
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers
    • 0.093% fail on Doors
      • 0.093% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.093% fail on Spare wheel
  • 11% fail on Steering (43% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Steering system (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Track rod end (42% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Other components (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Steering pivot point (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.093% fail on Steering component
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Drag link end (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Steering box (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Free play
        • 0.28% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.093% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.74% fail on Power steering
      • 0.46% fail on Other components
      • 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.28% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Steering operation
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (26% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.93% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Tank
      • 0.65% fail on System
      • 0.093% fail on Cap
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 9.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.83% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Mirrors (78% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.093% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.093% fail on Size/type
    • 0.093% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (63% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts (68% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
      • 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.46% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.56% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.56% fail on Attachment
  • 0.37% fail on Towbars
    • 0.37% fail on Towbar