Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.4% pass rate
from 736 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (73% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Switch
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps (94% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Position lamp (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.14% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.2% fail on Horn
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.41% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.9% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.41% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.41% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.41% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.27% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
  • 21% fail on Body, chassis, structure (34% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.4% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.8% fail on Joints
        • 0.14% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 4.9% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Flexible couplings (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Bearing housing (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust system (63% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Chassis (71% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Chassis condition (73% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 5.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (75% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (79% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 2.3% fail on Body (97% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Panel
      • 0.68% fail on Other body component
      • 0.41% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.27% fail on Body condition
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on Pipe
      • 0.41% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.27% fail on Hose
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
    • 1.2% fail on Cabs (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Cab condition
      • 0.14% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.41% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.41% fail on Floor
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.14% fail on Carrier
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
      • 0.14% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
      • 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.14% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.14% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 7.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.1% fail on Springs (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Leaf spring (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.14% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.68% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.5% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.41% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.27% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.14% fail on Axles
      • 0.14% fail on Axle
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 8.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.95% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.82% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt
          • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.2% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Other braking system component (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (57% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.14% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.14% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.82% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.68% fail on Pedal
      • 0.14% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.54% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.27% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.27% fail on Valves
    • 0.54% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.54% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.14% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.14% fail on Lever
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 9.1% fail on Steering
    • 7.3% fail on Steering linkage components (81% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Drag link end (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Intermediate drop arm (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.82% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Steering box (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Power steering
      • 0.54% fail on Other components
      • 0.27% fail on Operation
    • 0.41% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.27% fail on Steering gear (86% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Steering box
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.27% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.14% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.54% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.68% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (66% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (75% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas (84% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.82% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.14% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.41% fail on Attachment