Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results
Registered in 200053.8% pass rate
from 457 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(83% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
7.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 7.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
7.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 7.4% fail on Stop lamp (63% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.88% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.44% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.44% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.22% fail on Dipswitch
- 3.3% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Position lamps
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.88% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.44% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.22% fail on Horn
-
0.44% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.44% fail on Switch
-
0.44% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.44% fail on Main beam tell-tale (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
7.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(83% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
21% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(37% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
9.8% fail on
Transmission
(140% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
5.7% fail on
Prop shafts
(4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Prop shaft (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.66% fail on Flexible couplings (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Bearing housing (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.6% fail on Joints
- 0.22% fail on Flexible couplings
-
5.7% fail on
Prop shafts
(4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 7.4% fail on Exhaust system (87% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Chassis
- 3.7% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.22% fail on Strengthening plate
-
3.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.22% fail on Strengthening plate
-
2.0% fail on
Body
- 1.5% fail on Panel (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.66% fail on Mounting fixings (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Body condition
-
1.8% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.3% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Tank
- 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.88% fail on
Cabs
- 0.88% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.66% fail on Bumpers
-
0.22% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.22% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.22% fail on
Load security
-
0.22% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.22% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.22% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.22% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Driver's seat
-
9.8% fail on
Transmission
(140% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
20% fail on
Suspension
- 8.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.7% fail on
Springs
(110% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
5.0% fail on
Leaf springs
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Leaf spring (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (13 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.66% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.22% fail on Shackle bracket
- 0.66% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
5.0% fail on
Leaf springs
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
5.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(86% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.88% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.1% fail on Ball joint
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.88% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.44% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.44% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.22% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
7.9% fail on
Brake performance
(36% better than other 2000 vans)
-
5.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 3.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
- 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(67% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.44% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt
- 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt
-
5.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 6.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.66% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.66% fail on Brake discs
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.4% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Other braking system component (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.66% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Other components
-
2.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.88% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.66% fail on Pedal
- 0.22% fail on Hand lever
-
0.44% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.22% fail on Valves
-
0.22% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.22% fail on Lever
- 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.22% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.22% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
7.9% fail on
Brake performance
(36% better than other 2000 vans)
-
12% fail on
Visibility
- 6.3% fail on Wipers
- 5.7% fail on Washers
-
0.44% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.44% fail on Windscreen
- 0.22% fail on Bonnet
-
8.5% fail on
Steering
-
7.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Track rod end
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.66% fail on Drag link end
- 0.44% fail on Intermediate drop arm (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Steering arm
-
0.22% fail on
Other components
- 0.22% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.22% fail on Locking devices
-
0.66% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.44% fail on Steering box (14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Operation
-
0.44% fail on
Power steering
- 0.22% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Other components
-
0.22% fail on
Steering play
- 0.22% fail on Steering box
-
7.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.22% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.22% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.22% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.22% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.8% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.5% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.22% fail on Other leaks
-
2.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.66% fail on Condition
- 0.44% fail on Size/type
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(59% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.88% fail on Condition
- 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas (85% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
- 0.66% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(59% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.66% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.66% fail on Registration plates
-
0.22% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.22% fail on Attachment