Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results
Registered in 200253.9% pass rate
from 1,754 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(14% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(85% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(85% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(85% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(34% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Flashing type
(34% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (42% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
-
5.2% fail on
Flashing type
(34% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.057% fail on Dipswitch
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.5% fail on Battery(ies) (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Horn (75% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring
- 2.2% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Position lamps
(140% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Position lamp (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.23% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.23% fail on Switch
-
0.17% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.057% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
6.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(85% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
20% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(34% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
10% fail on
Transmission
(110% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(39% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Joints (39% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Flexible couplings
-
5.2% fail on
Prop shafts
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Prop shaft (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Bearing housing (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Flexible couplings (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(39% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Exhaust system (43% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Chassis
(50% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Chassis condition (51% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.057% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.057% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.057% fail on Strengthening plate
-
2.1% fail on
Body
(110% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.57% fail on Panel
- 0.11% fail on Body condition
- 0.11% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.97% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.51% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.29% fail on Pipe
- 0.17% fail on Tank
-
0.46% fail on
Cabs
- 0.46% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.34% fail on Bumpers
-
0.17% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.057% fail on Bracket
-
0.11% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.11% fail on
Load security
-
0.11% fail on
Tailgate
(7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Tailgate condition (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.11% fail on
Tailgate
(7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.057% fail on
Towbar
- 0.057% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.057% fail on
Doors
-
0.057% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.057% fail on Catch
-
0.057% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.057% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.057% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.057% fail on Undertray
-
10% fail on
Transmission
(110% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
6.5% fail on
Springs
(86% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Leaf springs
(5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Leaf spring (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Shackle bracket (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.74% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.057% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.057% fail on Coil spring
-
5.9% fail on
Leaf springs
(5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.17% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(38% better than other 2002 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Ball joint
- 0.68% fail on Suspension arm (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes (89% better than other 2002 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.46% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.17% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.23% fail on
Sub-frames
(77% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (78% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.057% fail on
Axles
- 0.057% fail on Axle
-
0.057% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.057% fail on Suspension rod
-
6.5% fail on
Springs
(86% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
(34% better than other 2002 vans)
-
5.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.23% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.17% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.057% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
-
4.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (34% better than other 2002 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.74% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(87% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.11% fail on
Parking brake performance
(94% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt
(94% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.057% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt
(94% better than other 2002 vans)
-
5.0% fail on
Service brake performance
- 7.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (54% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(56% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.91% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.91% fail on Brake pads
-
0.46% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(65% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Brake discs (68% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Brake drums
-
0.057% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.057% fail on Cable
-
0.91% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Load sensing valves (51% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.74% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.68% fail on Pedal
- 0.057% fail on Hand lever
-
0.74% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.74% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.68% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.46% fail on Brake fluid (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Valves
-
0.68% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.63% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.51% fail on Other braking system component (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Other components
-
0.63% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.17% fail on
Parking brake control
(74% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Lever (74% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.11% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.057% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.057% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
(34% better than other 2002 vans)
-
8.8% fail on
Visibility
- 4.6% fail on Wipers
- 4.6% fail on Washers
-
0.23% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.17% fail on Windscreen
- 0.057% fail on Window
-
0.057% fail on
View to rear
- 0.057% fail on Mirrors
-
7.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(71% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
6.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(68% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(54% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.17% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.11% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.057% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.057% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
- 0.057% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.11% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
1.8% fail on
Spark ignition
(130% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(54% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Fluid leaks
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Engine oil leaks (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Other leaks
- 0.057% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
6.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(68% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Steering
-
5.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.8% fail on Track rod end
- 0.97% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Drag link end
- 0.23% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Intermediate drop arm (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.17% fail on
Other components
(5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Steering linkage (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.63% fail on
Steering play
(190% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Steering box (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Steering rack
-
0.51% fail on
Power steering
- 0.23% fail on Operation
- 0.23% fail on Other components
- 0.057% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.46% fail on
Steering gear
(72% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Steering box (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.3% fail on
Tyres
(37% better than other 2002 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 1.3% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Size/type
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(50% better than other 2002 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(59% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.91% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas (87% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Requirements
- 0.86% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(59% better than other 2002 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates
-
0.46% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.46% fail on Attachment
-
0.057% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.057% fail on Speedometer