Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2003
53.0% pass rate
from 5,505 tests in 2017
(9.7% better than other 2003 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (27% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Front lamps (32% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Rear lamps (23% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (28% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Tell tale
    • 6.8% fail on Direction indicators (60% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on Flashing type (60% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Individual lamps (84% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.96% fail on All direction indicators (95% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.018% fail on Switch
    • 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim (24% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (60% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.054% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
        • 0.018% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.054% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.036% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
        • 0.018% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.036% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.018% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.69% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Horn (78% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning (63% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Lamp
      • 0.073% fail on Switch (87% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.018% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.054% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 23% fail on Suspension (10% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Leaf springs (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Shackle (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Anchor (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Other pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Securing bolts (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Shackle bracket (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Anchor bracket (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Spring eye (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Spring saddle
    • 7.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (20% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (59% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment (94% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.018% fail on Linkage condition
    • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.054% fail on Couplings
      • 0.31% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Drive shafts (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Universal joint
    • 4.5% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Fitment (10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas (54% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Component mounting (44% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting (62% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Subframe mounting (86% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (69% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings (44% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Front (34% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Rear (86% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints (47% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment
    • 0.036% fail on General condition
    • 0.036% fail on Axles
      • 0.018% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.018% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.018% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.018% fail on Condition
    • 0.018% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.018% fail on Condition
  • 16% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 11% fail on Components
        • 9.6% fail on Pipes (52% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.93% fail on Valves (67% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Hoses (58% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.018% fail on Servos
      • 0.54% fail on Leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance (51% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Front wheels (28% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (73% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (64% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.89% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.018% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 1.3% fail on Hub components (57% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake discs (88% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.036% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.018% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.47% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.47% fail on Pedal
        • 0.33% fail on Anti-slip (46% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake (77% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.018% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.091% fail on ABS (79% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.036% fail on Mechanical components (93% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Cable (91% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.018% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.018% fail on Components
        • 0.018% fail on Pump/compressors
  • 9.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (42% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system (55% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system (56% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Tank (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on System
      • 0.33% fail on Cap
      • 0.018% fail on Hose
    • 1.9% fail on Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested (76% worse than other 2003 vans)
  • 9.1% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers (22% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Washers (27% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Windscreen (64% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Mirrors (82% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.036% fail on Bonnet (84% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 8.1% fail on Steering
    • 7.5% fail on Steering system (19% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Other components (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Steering pivot point (10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.018% fail on Steering component
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint (63% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.25% fail on Free play
        • 0.24% fail on Steering box (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.018% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Intermediate drop arm (8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Steering rack (97% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Power steering (59% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
      • 0.073% fail on Other components (73% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Drive system
      • 0.036% fail on Pump
      • 0.018% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.018% fail on Rams
    • 0.16% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.091% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.091% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.036% fail on Steering control (83% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.018% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.018% fail on Steering column
  • 5.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (22% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Body condition (19% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis
    • 0.18% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.16% fail on Seats (58% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Drivers
      • 0.073% fail on Passengers
    • 0.13% fail on Body security
    • 0.073% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.036% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.036% fail on Doors (97% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Passengers other (92% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.036% fail on Load security
      • 0.018% fail on Access panel
      • 0.018% fail on Hinged tailboard
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth (35% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.98% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.073% fail on Size/type (83% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.054% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.018% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (76% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Seat belts (79% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas (91% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Requirements
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment
    • 0.53% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (70% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (68% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
  • 0.22% fail on Towbars
    • 0.18% fail on Towbar
    • 0.018% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.018% fail on Adjustable towbar