Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
54.0% pass rate
from 6,623 tests in 2017
(7.8% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Position lamps (19% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Front lamps (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.14% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (14% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Fog lamp (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.030% fail on Switch
    • 6.2% fail on Direction indicators (62% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Flashing type (62% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Individual lamps (64% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Side repeaters (92% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on All direction indicators (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp (23% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim (17% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Rear reflectors (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (55% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.030% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
        • 0.015% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.030% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.015% fail on Switch
      • 0.015% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 0.62% fail on Horn (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Trailer electrical socket (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning (53% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Lamp
      • 0.091% fail on Switch (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.015% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.045% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (73% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 22% fail on Suspension (7.4% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (41% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (52% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.015% fail on Presence
    • 8.5% fail on Leaf springs (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Shackle (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Anchor (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Other pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Securing bolts (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Shackle bracket (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Spring eye (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.030% fail on Spring slippers (12 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.7% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.045% fail on Couplings
        • 0.015% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.075% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.045% fail on Universal joint
        • 0.045% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.5% fail on Shock absorbers (81% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Condition (80% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Fitment (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.1% fail on Front
      • 0.060% fail on Rear (87% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints (45% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Prescribed areas (83% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Component mounting (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Spring mounting (85% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.015% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.045% fail on General condition
    • 0.030% fail on Coil springs (99% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Condition (99% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.030% fail on Condition
    • 0.030% fail on Sub-frames (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment
    • 0.015% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
    • 0.015% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.015% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.015% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.015% fail on Condition
  • 15% fail on Brakes (23% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (14% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Components (17% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 7.9% fail on Pipes (47% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Hoses (46% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.075% fail on Valves (92% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
      • 0.23% fail on Leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance (50% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.7% fail on Rear wheels (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.86% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.075% fail on Brake operation
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components (42% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (31% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.015% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.015% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.89% fail on ABS (41% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.54% fail on Pedal
        • 0.30% fail on Anti-slip (45% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake (61% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.075% fail on Mechanical components (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Lever
      • 0.030% fail on Cable (91% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.045% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
      • 0.015% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.030% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.015% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.015% fail on Components
        • 0.015% fail on Pipes
  • 9.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (66% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Fuel system (94% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Cap (85% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Pipe (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on System
      • 0.060% fail on Hose
    • 2.1% fail on Emissions (71% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Emissions not tested (98% worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 7.7% fail on Steering (20% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Steering system (27% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Steering box (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Steering pivot point (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Steering component
      • 0.38% fail on Drag link end (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Free play
        • 0.26% fail on Steering box (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.65% fail on Power steering
      • 0.39% fail on Other components (90% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Operation (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.045% fail on Pump
      • 0.015% fail on Drive system
      • 0.015% fail on Rams
    • 0.14% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.060% fail on Steering control
      • 0.030% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.015% fail on Steering column
      • 0.015% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.015% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (34% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers (22% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Windscreen (66% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Mirrors (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.075% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth (35% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.015% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (67% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition (60% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Vehicle structure (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Chassis (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Seats (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.075% fail on Drivers (71% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Passengers (80% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.075% fail on Body security
    • 0.075% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.060% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.060% fail on Doors (93% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Drivers (86% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Passengers front (89% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Passengers other (91% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Load security
      • 0.015% fail on Access panel
      • 0.015% fail on Hinged tailboard
    • 0.015% fail on Engine mountings
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (74% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Seat belts (76% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas (91% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment
    • 0.50% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (71% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment (71% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.015% fail on Condition
  • 0.11% fail on Towbars
    • 0.11% fail on Towbar