Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2008
52.2% pass rate
from 4,178 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.048% fail on Switch
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.6% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.024% fail on Switch
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (23% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (42% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.024% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.74% fail on Horn
      • 0.45% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.38% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.84% fail on Rear reflectors (87% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Direction indicators (77% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Flashing type (77% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (80% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.096% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.024% fail on Switch
    • 0.072% fail on Hazard warning (78% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Switch (78% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.048% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.048% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 21% fail on Suspension (16% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Springs (100% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 6.5% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.79% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Shackle bracket (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.43% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Coil spring (79% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 8.0% fail on Suspension arms (40% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (52% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (74% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover (72% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Linkage (80% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Pins and bushes (94% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (93% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component (82% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.26% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (85% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.024% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.024% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance (45% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (37% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (31% worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (65% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (9 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.072% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (90% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp) (92% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.096% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (82% better than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.072% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.024% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.48% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt (sp) (65% better than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (82% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (39% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (22% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads (22% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Brake discs and drums (61% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs (62% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (60% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Cable (60% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.048% fail on Lever
        • 0.024% fail on Linkage
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (71% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Pedal
      • 0.50% fail on Hand lever (150% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.79% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.41% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake control (52% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Lever (53% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.048% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.096% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.048% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.024% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.024% fail on Valves
    • 0.096% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.048% fail on Other components
      • 0.048% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.024% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
        • 0.024% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Transmission (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 7.0% fail on Joints (140% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.048% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.024% fail on Drive shaft
      • 2.3% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Flexible couplings (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Bearing housing (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Exhaust system (58% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Body
      • 0.31% fail on Other body component
      • 0.24% fail on Panel
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.34% fail on Tank (150% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.34% fail on Chassis
      • 0.34% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.024% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.096% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.024% fail on Coupling
    • 0.096% fail on Integral vehicle structure (87% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (87% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.096% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.048% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.048% fail on Carrier
    • 0.072% fail on Undertray
    • 0.048% fail on Doors (91% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Front passenger's door (79% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Door condition
        • 0.024% fail on Catch
    • 0.048% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.048% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.024% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.024% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.024% fail on Cabs
      • 0.024% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.3% fail on Visibility (21% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass (59% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen (58% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on View to rear (77% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors (79% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.072% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.048% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (51% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Seat belts (76% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.024% fail on Requirements
    • 0.22% fail on Airbags (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers airbag (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
  • 4.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (37% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (36% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Compression ignition (38% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.48% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (55% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.36% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (69% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.048% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.048% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition (30% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.38% fail on Fluid leaks (50% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks (54% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.048% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.048% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (34% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (28% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (69% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Steering linkage components (81% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.048% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.57% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Other components
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
      • 0.048% fail on Rams
      • 0.024% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.36% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.34% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.024% fail on Steering box
    • 0.024% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.024% fail on Steering play
      • 0.024% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.91% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.57% fail on Road Wheels (86% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Attachment (140% worse than other 2008 vans)