Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
60.0% pass rate
from 3,163 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.5% fail on Position lamps (32% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Front lamps (54% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (23% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp (43% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (34% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (34% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.032% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.032% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.032% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.92% fail on Rear reflectors (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Direction indicators (75% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Flashing type (75% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Individual lamps (83% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters (73% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.57% fail on Battery (92% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Horn (69% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Lamp
    • 0.063% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.063% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Leaf springs (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.98% fail on Shackle (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Anchor
      • 0.095% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.095% fail on Securing bolts
      • 0.063% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.032% fail on Spring slippers
      • 0.032% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.13% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.063% fail on Universal joint
        • 0.063% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints (44% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (69% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (64% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (46% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings (53% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Front
      • 0.095% fail on Rear
    • 0.063% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.063% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.032% fail on General condition
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Components (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Pipes (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.063% fail on Hoses (85% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.032% fail on Operation
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance (52% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.85% fail on Brake imbalance (97% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Rear wheels (81% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.095% fail on Service brake performance (77% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components (33% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.19% fail on Brake discs (82% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on ABS
    • 0.47% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.47% fail on Pedal
        • 0.35% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.16% fail on Cable
    • 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.063% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 7.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (32% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.22% fail on Mirrors (73% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.032% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (26% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.032% fail on Size/type
  • 2.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
      • 0.063% fail on Requirements
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Operation (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.095% fail on Rams (11 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Steering system (83% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end (95% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Free play
        • 0.032% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.063% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.032% fail on Steering control
      • 0.032% fail on Steering column
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.66% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (55% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Body condition
    • 0.16% fail on Body security
    • 0.095% fail on Seats
      • 0.063% fail on Drivers
      • 0.032% fail on Passengers
    • 0.063% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.032% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.032% fail on Doors
      • 0.032% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.032% fail on Load security
      • 0.032% fail on Access panel
  • 0.57% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (76% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Exhaust system (77% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system (82% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on System
      • 0.032% fail on Tank
      • 0.032% fail on Cap
    • 0.032% fail on Emissions
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.032% fail on Condition
  • 0.095% fail on Towbars
    • 0.095% fail on Towbar