Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results
Registered in 201067.4% pass rate
from 4,647 tests in 2017
(17% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(17% better than other 2010 vans)
-
7.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.6% fail on Front lamps (19% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.82% fail on Rear lamps (55% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.11% fail on All position lamps
- 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (34% better than other 2010 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 6.6% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Tell tale (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamps
(38% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.82% fail on Rear reflectors (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.43% fail on
Direction indicators
(84% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(84% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Individual lamps (80% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.043% fail on Side repeaters (95% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.022% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.022% fail on Switch
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(84% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Battery (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.086% fail on Horn (87% better than other 2010 vans)
-
7.1% fail on
Position lamps
-
9.4% fail on
Brakes
(20% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(47% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Components
(44% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Pipes (61% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.086% fail on Hoses (72% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.086% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.022% fail on Cylinders
- 0.24% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.22% fail on Operation (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Leaks
-
3.7% fail on
Components
(44% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Hub components
(35% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads (23% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Brake discs (60% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.022% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
(47% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Front wheels (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Rear wheels (74% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.065% fail on Brake operation
- 0.022% fail on Gradient hand brake
- 0.022% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.95% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.95% fail on Condition
-
0.37% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.37% fail on
Pedal
- 0.24% fail on Anti-slip (59% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.37% fail on
Pedal
- 0.19% fail on ABS (63% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.086% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.065% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.065% fail on Cable
- 0.022% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.022% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.022% fail on
Components
- 0.022% fail on Pipes
-
0.022% fail on
Components
-
4.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(47% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension
(49% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Leaf springs
(200% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.49% fail on
Pins and bushes
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Shackle (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.022% fail on Anchor
- 0.15% fail on Securing bolts
- 0.022% fail on Anchor bracket
-
1.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
(67% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(37% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(39% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (38% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.022% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.086% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.065% fail on Drive shafts
- 0.043% fail on Universal joint
-
1.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(39% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.86% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(80% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.043% fail on Linkage condition (87% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.022% fail on Condition
-
0.62% fail on
Wheel bearings
(44% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Front
- 0.043% fail on Rear (82% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Front suspension joints (51% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.45% fail on
Suspension arms
(79% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.022% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.022% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Leaf springs
(200% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
6.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(25% better than other 2010 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Windscreen (51% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors (83% better than other 2010 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Tyres
(43% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth (32% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
- 0.065% fail on Valve stem
-
1.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.3% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(110% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.086% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.30% fail on
Seat belts
(57% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.022% fail on Requirements
-
1.3% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(110% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Steering
(73% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.60% fail on
Power steering
- 0.30% fail on Operation
- 0.30% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.086% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.41% fail on
Steering system
(87% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Steering rack
- 0.11% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.065% fail on Ball joint
-
0.022% fail on
Free play
- 0.022% fail on Steering rack
- 0.022% fail on Steering operation
-
0.60% fail on
Power steering
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.71% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(38% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Body condition
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
- 0.086% fail on Passengers
- 0.022% fail on Drivers
- 0.065% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.065% fail on
Doors
(81% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.043% fail on Drivers
- 0.022% fail on Passengers front
- 0.065% fail on Spare wheel
-
0.043% fail on
Load security
- 0.043% fail on Tailgate (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.022% fail on Body security
-
0.41% fail on
Road Wheels
(93% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Attachment (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(86% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Exhaust system (81% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.065% fail on
Fuel system
(90% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.065% fail on Cap
-
0.065% fail on
Towbars
- 0.065% fail on Towbar