Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.2% pass rate
from 5,072 tests in 2020
(11% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.020% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.14% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps (23% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (22% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.020% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.91% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.37% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Battery(ies) (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Horn (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.87% fail on Rear reflectors (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.020% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.95% fail on Service brake imbalance (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.039% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.039% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.71% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (86% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.020% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (88% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.039% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.020% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (32% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads (32% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.63% fail on Brake discs and drums (58% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Brake discs (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (57% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Cable
        • 0.039% fail on Lever
    • 0.95% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.59% fail on Pedal
      • 0.37% fail on Hand lever (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.63% fail on Lever
    • 0.51% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Anti-lock braking system (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.079% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.039% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.020% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.020% fail on Servos
  • 10.0% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Springs
      • 3.9% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Leaf spring (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.079% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.039% fail on Spring saddle
        • 0.039% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.079% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms (36% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Pins and bushes (98% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Linkage ball joints (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Ball joint dust cover (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.020% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.020% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.4% fail on Transmission (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.6% fail on Joints
        • 0.039% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.020% fail on Drive shaft
      • 2.0% fail on Prop shafts (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.83% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Prop shaft (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Flexible couplings (14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Bearing housing (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
      • 0.059% fail on Panel
    • 0.18% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Towbar (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Other towbar components (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Safety device
    • 0.099% fail on Seats
      • 0.059% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.039% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.059% fail on Fuel system (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Tank
    • 0.039% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.020% fail on Carrier
    • 0.039% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.020% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.020% fail on Bracket
    • 0.039% fail on Doors (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.020% fail on Door condition
      • 0.020% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.020% fail on Door condition
    • 0.020% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.020% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.020% fail on Chassis
      • 0.020% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.020% fail on Load security
      • 0.020% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.020% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.020% fail on Undertray
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility (27% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen (68% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors (83% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.079% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 2.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition (56% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (42% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (70% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.020% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.020% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.34% fail on Spark ignition (68% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Fluid leaks (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.020% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.020% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.020% fail on Undertray
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (90% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Seat belts (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
      • 0.039% fail on Prescribed areas (88% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.059% fail on Airbags
      • 0.059% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (69% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Power steering
      • 0.45% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Operation
      • 0.059% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.039% fail on Rams
    • 0.45% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.39% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.039% fail on Operation
      • 0.020% fail on Steering box
    • 0.39% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Other components
        • 0.020% fail on Steering component
      • 0.020% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.020% fail on Steering column
    • 0.020% fail on Steering play
      • 0.020% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.81% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.81% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment (95% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.039% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.039% fail on Speedometer (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.020% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.020% fail on Belt(s)/padding