MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mitsubishi » L200 » 2010

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.2% pass rate
from 4,636 tests in 2021
(5.3% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 9.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Switch
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Direction indicators (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Flashing type (69% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Individual direction indicators (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.065% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.84% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.47% fail on Battery(ies) (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Trailer electrical socket (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Horn (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.78% fail on Position lamps (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Position lamp (85% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.22% fail on Reversing lamps (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Reversing lamps (68% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.043% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.022% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.022% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.022% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.022% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.022% fail on Switch
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (30% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (30% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (91% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.84% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (84% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.022% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.69% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt (sp) (40% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.54% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.043% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.043% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.043% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.043% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.022% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (50% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Brake discs and drums (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Brake discs (56% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.043% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.065% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (85% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.065% fail on Cable (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Pedal
    • 0.93% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Anti-lock braking system (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.58% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.58% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.086% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.043% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.065% fail on Flexible brake hoses (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.043% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.043% fail on Other components
  • 13% fail on Suspension (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.5% fail on Ball joint (86% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes (94% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Springs (20% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Leaf springs (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Leaf spring (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.56% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.11% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.043% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.043% fail on Spring saddle
        • 0.022% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.37% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Coil spring (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Pins and bushes (94% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.37% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (69% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Axles
      • 0.022% fail on Axle
  • 8.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.9% fail on Transmission (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts (48% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Joints (48% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.065% fail on Flexible couplings (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.043% fail on Drive shaft
      • 2.0% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.97% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Flexible couplings (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Bearing housing (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Exhaust system (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Body
      • 0.41% fail on Other body component
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
      • 0.022% fail on Body condition
    • 0.28% fail on Chassis
      • 0.28% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.26% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.022% fail on Pipe
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.022% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.086% fail on Carrier
      • 0.022% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.065% fail on Integral vehicle structure (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (91% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Towbar
      • 0.065% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.043% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.043% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.022% fail on Cabs
      • 0.022% fail on Steps
    • 0.022% fail on Undertray
  • 6.9% fail on Visibility (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (37% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.022% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth (26% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (40% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (29% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.043% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.022% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.022% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.47% fail on Spark ignition (57% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.37% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.065% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.043% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (89% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Seat belts (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Requirements
      • 0.086% fail on Prescribed areas (89% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.043% fail on Airbags
      • 0.043% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.2% fail on Steering (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Power steering (98% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.043% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.022% fail on Pump
      • 0.022% fail on Rams
    • 0.82% fail on Steering gear (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Steering rack (85% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Operation
    • 0.71% fail on Steering linkage components (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Other components
        • 0.022% fail on Steering component
    • 0.022% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.022% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.022% fail on Steering play
      • 0.022% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.93% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.93% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.63% fail on Road Wheels (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Attachment (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.043% fail on Condition