Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
67.4% pass rate
from 4,647 tests in 2017
(17% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (17% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.6% fail on Front lamps (19% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Rear lamps (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Tell tale (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (38% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Rear reflectors (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Direction indicators (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Flashing type (84% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Individual lamps (80% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.043% fail on Side repeaters (95% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.022% fail on Switch
    • 0.39% fail on Battery (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.086% fail on Horn (87% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 9.4% fail on Brakes (20% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (47% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Components (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Pipes (61% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.086% fail on Hoses (72% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.086% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.022% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Operation (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Brake pads (23% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake discs (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Rear wheels (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.065% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.022% fail on Gradient hand brake
      • 0.022% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.95% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.95% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.37% fail on Pedal
        • 0.24% fail on Anti-slip (59% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on ABS (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.086% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.065% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.065% fail on Cable
    • 0.022% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.022% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.022% fail on Components
        • 0.022% fail on Pipes
  • 6.9% fail on Suspension (49% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Leaf springs (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Shackle (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Anchor
      • 0.15% fail on Securing bolts
      • 0.022% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Front drive shafts (39% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.086% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.065% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.043% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.86% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Linkage condition (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on Wheel bearings (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Front
      • 0.043% fail on Rear (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Front suspension joints (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Suspension arms (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.022% fail on Condition
  • 6.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (25% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Windscreen (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors (83% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (32% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.065% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.086% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.022% fail on Requirements
  • 1.0% fail on Steering (73% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
      • 0.30% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.086% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.41% fail on Steering system (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Free play
        • 0.022% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.022% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.71% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.086% fail on Passengers
      • 0.022% fail on Drivers
    • 0.065% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.065% fail on Doors (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Drivers
      • 0.022% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.065% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.043% fail on Load security
      • 0.043% fail on Tailgate (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Body security
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels (93% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Attachment (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.24% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Exhaust system (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Fuel system (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Cap
  • 0.065% fail on Towbars
    • 0.065% fail on Towbar