MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Cabstar » 1995
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Cabstar MOT Results

Registered in 1995
54.0% pass rate
from 50 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 14% fail on Position lamps
      • 10% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.0% fail on Battery
    • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 6.0% fail on Fog lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
  • 26% fail on Brakes
    • 18% fail on Brake performance
      • 12% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 6.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 6.0% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.0% fail on Components
        • 2.0% fail on Pipes
        • 2.0% fail on Hoses
        • 2.0% fail on Valves
    • 2.0% fail on Service brake control components
      • 2.0% fail on Pedal
        • 2.0% fail on Anti-slip
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 8.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 8.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 8.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 8.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 4.0% fail on Spring mounting
    • 6.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 6.0% fail on Front (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 4.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Leaf springs
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 16% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (160% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 16% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (170% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Attachment
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.0% fail on Washers
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Mirrors (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
  • 10% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 4.0% fail on Chassis
    • 4.0% fail on Body condition
    • 2.0% fail on Load security
      • 2.0% fail on Tailgate
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.0% fail on Cap
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 6.0% fail on Condition
  • 4.0% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering system
      • 2.0% fail on Drag link end
      • 2.0% fail on Other components
        • 2.0% fail on Steering pivot point
  • 2.0% fail on Road Wheels
    • 2.0% fail on Condition