Nissan Cabstar MOT Results

Registered in 1996
49.1% pass rate
from 55 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 9.1% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on All position lamps
    • 11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 9.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 9.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.6% fail on Horn
      • 1.8% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 1.8% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.8% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 29% fail on Brakes
    • 25% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (190% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 15% fail on Rbt (sp) (190% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 15% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 9.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 9.1% fail on Rbt
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 7.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
        • 1.8% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
  • 27% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 7.3% fail on Seats (15 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Driver's seat (23 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Cabs (23 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Prescribed areas (31 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 5.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.6% fail on Chassis
      • 3.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.8% fail on Tank
      • 1.8% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 3.6% fail on Load security (40 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Dropside (229 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Dropside condition (229 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Transmission
      • 1.8% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.8% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.8% fail on Body
      • 1.8% fail on Mounting fixings
  • 25% fail on Visibility (170% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 15% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 11% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on View to rear (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Mirrors (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 9.1% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.8% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.8% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 1.8% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.8% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.8% fail on Sub-frame
  • 15% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 15% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 15% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
  • 7.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 5.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (8 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
  • 1.8% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 1.8% fail on Speedometer