Nissan Cabstar MOT Results
Registered in 199956.2% pass rate
from 153 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 10% fail on Fog lamp (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Tell tale
-
7.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.2% fail on Front lamps
- 3.9% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.6% fail on Battery
- 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.9% fail on Individual lamps
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.65% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.65% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.65% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.65% fail on Horn
-
22% fail on
Brakes
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
- 7.8% fail on Front wheels
- 7.8% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 6.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.65% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
7.2% fail on
Components
- 5.2% fail on Pipes
- 2.0% fail on Valves
- 2.6% fail on Leaks (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Components
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Hub components
- 0.65% fail on Brake pads
- 0.65% fail on Brake drums
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 10% fail on Component mounting
- 4.6% fail on Spring mounting
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.65% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.0% fail on Front
- 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
-
2.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.0% fail on Condition
-
0.65% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.65% fail on Condition
-
0.65% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.65% fail on Attachment
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
18% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
18% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 17% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Condition
- 0.65% fail on Attachment
-
18% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.3% fail on Emissions
-
3.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.3% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Cap
- 0.65% fail on Pipe
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
10% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
5.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 5.9% fail on Chassis
- 5.2% fail on Body condition
-
0.65% fail on
Seats
- 0.65% fail on Drivers
-
5.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
9.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.9% fail on Washers
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Windscreen
-
7.2% fail on
Steering
-
5.9% fail on
Steering system
- 2.6% fail on Track rod end
-
1.3% fail on
Other components
(14 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Steering pivot point (15 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Ball joint
- 0.65% fail on Drag link end
- 0.65% fail on Steering arm
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Steering system
-
2.6% fail on
Tyres
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
-
0.65% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.65% fail on Attachment