MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Cabstar » 1999
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Cabstar MOT Results

Registered in 1999
56.2% pass rate
from 153 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 10% fail on Fog lamp (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Tell tale
    • 7.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.6% fail on Battery
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Individual lamps
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.65% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.65% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.65% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.65% fail on Horn
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 7.8% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.65% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 9.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.2% fail on Components
        • 5.2% fail on Pipes
        • 2.0% fail on Valves
      • 2.6% fail on Leaks (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Hub components
      • 0.65% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.65% fail on Brake drums
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 10% fail on Component mounting
      • 4.6% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.0% fail on Front
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.65% fail on Attachment
  • 18% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 18% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 17% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
      • 0.65% fail on Attachment
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.3% fail on Emissions
    • 3.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Cap
      • 0.65% fail on Pipe
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 10% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 5.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 5.9% fail on Chassis
    • 5.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.65% fail on Seats
      • 0.65% fail on Drivers
  • 9.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.2% fail on Steering
    • 5.9% fail on Steering system
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Other components (14 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Steering pivot point (15 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.65% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.65% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment