Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Nissan Cabstar MOT Results

Registered in 2000
49.3% pass rate
from 207 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 7.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 7.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 4.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.4% fail on Horn
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.48% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Main beam tell-tale (15 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.48% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.48% fail on Switch
  • 25% fail on Brakes
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (78% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 9.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 9.2% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.48% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.48% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.48% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.48% fail on Cable
    • 1.9% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.48% fail on Lever
    • 0.48% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.48% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.48% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.8% fail on Chassis
      • 4.3% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.48% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.9% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 0.97% fail on Other body component
      • 0.48% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 1.4% fail on Cabs
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Towbar
      • 0.48% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.48% fail on Transmission
      • 0.48% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.48% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.48% fail on Load security
      • 0.48% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.48% fail on Doors
      • 0.48% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.48% fail on Door condition
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 5.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.48% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (57% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.4% fail on Springs
      • 2.4% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.4% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.48% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.48% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.48% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.48% fail on Axles
      • 0.48% fail on King pins
    • 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 13% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 13% fail on Seat belts (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
      • 0.48% fail on Attachment
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 5.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.9% fail on View to rear
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.48% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.48% fail on Driver's view
  • 9.2% fail on Steering
    • 7.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.97% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.97% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.48% fail on Other components
        • 0.48% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.97% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Power steering
      • 0.97% fail on Operation
    • 0.48% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.48% fail on Steering box
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.97% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.48% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.48% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.97% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.48% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.48% fail on Attachment