Nissan Cabstar MOT Results
Registered in 200245.8% pass rate
from 613 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.
-
34% fail on
Brakes
(54% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
29% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 23% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 12% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 11% fail on Rear wheels (98% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Front wheels
- 0.33% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.5% fail on
Components
(34% better than other 2002 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Pipes (42% better than other 2002 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Hoses
- 0.82% fail on Valves (74% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.6% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
6.5% fail on
Components
(34% better than other 2002 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake
- 2.3% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Hub components
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
- 0.98% fail on Brake pads
-
0.65% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.33% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
- 0.16% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.16% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.33% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.33% fail on
Pedal
- 0.33% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.33% fail on
Pedal
- 0.33% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.16% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.16% fail on Cable
-
29% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
34% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
12% fail on
Direction indicators
(200% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
12% fail on
Flashing type
(200% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.8% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Individual lamps (72% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.65% fail on All direction indicators
-
12% fail on
Flashing type
(200% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
- 8.8% fail on Rear lamps (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Front lamps
- 0.16% fail on All position lamps
-
7.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(78% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Fog lamp (70% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Tell tale
- 0.33% fail on Switch
- 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp
-
0.16% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.16% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (57% better than other 2002 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Horn
- 2.0% fail on Battery
- 0.49% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.49% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.33% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.33% fail on Lamp
- 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
12% fail on
Direction indicators
(200% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
20% fail on
Suspension
(19% better than other 2002 vans)
-
14% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(190% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.16% fail on Condition
-
5.2% fail on
Axles
(30 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 4.2% fail on King pins (36 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Axle beam (28 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Stub axle (33 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.1% fail on Condition
-
2.9% fail on
Leaf springs
(160% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Pins and bushes
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Shackle (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Anchor (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Securing bolts (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Spring eye
- 0.16% fail on Anchor bracket
-
2.0% fail on
Pins and bushes
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.82% fail on
Prescribed areas
(90% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Component mounting (90% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.16% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.33% fail on
Suspension arms
(94% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (93% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Front suspension joints (87% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.16% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.16% fail on Front
-
0.16% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.16% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.16% fail on Universal joint
-
0.16% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
-
14% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(190% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
13% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.9% fail on Washers (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 2.8% fail on Mirrors (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Windscreen
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(67% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 8.0% fail on Exhaust system (79% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.82% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.65% fail on System
- 0.33% fail on Cap
- 2.0% fail on Emissions
- 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
11% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(110% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
11% fail on
Seat belts
(170% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 10.0% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 0.49% fail on Requirements
- 0.49% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
11% fail on
Seat belts
(170% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
10% fail on
Steering
(38% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
9.3% fail on
Steering system
(43% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Drag link end (26 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Track rod end
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Steering arm
-
0.16% fail on
Other components
- 0.16% fail on Steering pivot point
- 0.82% fail on Steering operation (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.49% fail on
Power steering
- 0.49% fail on Other components
- 0.16% fail on Operation
- 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas
-
9.3% fail on
Steering system
(43% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
10% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 5.4% fail on Body condition
-
2.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.4% fail on Chassis
-
2.3% fail on
Seats
(4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Drivers (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Passengers
-
0.49% fail on
Load security
(4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Hinged tailboard (22 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Dropside
- 0.33% fail on Body security
-
0.16% fail on
Doors
- 0.16% fail on Passengers other
- 0.16% fail on Spare wheel
-
6.9% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth (47% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Valve stem
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate
-
0.33% fail on
Towbars
- 0.16% fail on Towbar
- 0.16% fail on Detachable tow ball
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Attachment