MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Cabstar » 2002

Nissan Cabstar MOT Results

Registered in 2002
45.8% pass rate
from 613 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Brakes (54% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 29% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 23% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (98% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.33% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.5% fail on Components (34% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Pipes (42% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Hoses
        • 0.82% fail on Valves (74% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.6% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.98% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.33% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.16% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal
        • 0.33% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.33% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.16% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.16% fail on Cable
  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Direction indicators (200% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Flashing type (200% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 7.8% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Individual lamps (72% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on All direction indicators
    • 11% fail on Position lamps
      • 8.8% fail on Rear lamps (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Fog lamp (70% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.33% fail on Switch
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.16% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (57% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Horn
    • 2.0% fail on Battery
    • 0.49% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.49% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.33% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.33% fail on Lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 20% fail on Suspension (19% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 14% fail on Anti-roll bars (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 5.2% fail on Axles (30 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on King pins (36 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Axle beam (28 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Stub axle (33 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Leaf springs (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Shackle (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on Anchor (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Securing bolts (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.16% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 0.82% fail on Prescribed areas (90% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Component mounting (90% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.33% fail on Suspension arms (94% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (93% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Front suspension joints (87% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.16% fail on Front
    • 0.16% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.16% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.16% fail on Universal joint
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.9% fail on Washers (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Mirrors (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (67% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Exhaust system (79% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.82% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on System
      • 0.33% fail on Cap
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 11% fail on Seat belts (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 10.0% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.49% fail on Requirements
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 10% fail on Steering (38% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Steering system (43% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Drag link end (26 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
        • 0.16% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.82% fail on Steering operation (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Power steering
      • 0.49% fail on Other components
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
    • 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 10% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 5.4% fail on Body condition
    • 2.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis
    • 2.3% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Drivers (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers
    • 0.49% fail on Load security (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Hinged tailboard (22 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Dropside
    • 0.33% fail on Body security
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (47% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.33% fail on Towbars
    • 0.16% fail on Towbar
    • 0.16% fail on Detachable tow ball
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment