Nissan Cabstar MOT Results

Registered in 2005
47.1% pass rate
from 733 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 13% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 7.0% fail on Side repeaters (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Individual lamps (94% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Fog lamp (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Tell tale (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
    • 7.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Rear lamps (93% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Front lamps (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (42% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamps (63% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp (67% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Dipswitch
    • 5.9% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.82% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.41% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Lamp
  • 32% fail on Brakes (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 30% fail on Brake performance (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 26% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 12% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Front wheels (78% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.5% fail on Components (36% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Pipes
        • 0.68% fail on Valves
        • 0.41% fail on Hoses
        • 0.27% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.41% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.41% fail on Leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 3.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.27% fail on Brake drums (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.82% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.41% fail on Cable
    • 0.27% fail on ABS (82% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.27% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage condition
    • 10% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 10% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Front suspension joints (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.95% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.95% fail on Front
    • 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas (86% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Component mounting (74% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.27% fail on Securing bolts
  • 16% fail on Driver's view of the road (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Washers (92% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.7% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 14% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 13% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 12% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.82% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Requirements
    • 0.68% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.68% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Body condition (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Seats (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Drivers (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers
    • 2.6% fail on Vehicle structure (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.14% fail on Load security
      • 0.14% fail on Hinged tailboard
      • 0.14% fail on Dropside
  • 12% fail on Steering (94% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on Track rod end (77% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Drag link end (33 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Steering pivot point (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Free play
        • 0.41% fail on Steering box (14 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Steering box
    • 0.55% fail on Prescribed areas (18 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 7.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Fuel system (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Cap (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on System (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Pipe
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
    • 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.41% fail on Emissions
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Size/type
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
  • 0.14% fail on Towbars
    • 0.14% fail on Towbar