Nissan D22 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
56.7% pass rate
from 150 tests in 2020
(7.9% better than other 2002 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan D22 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Brakes (2.8% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (12% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 10% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (0.14% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (19% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (32% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (34% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (49% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (29% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (40% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.67% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.67% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (7.5% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Load sensing valves (16% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.67% fail on Pedal
    • 0.67% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.67% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.67% fail on Lever
  • 18% fail on Suspension (9.0% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Suspension arms (9.7% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Ball joint (51% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (36% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Springs (58% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.67% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (70% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Wheel bearings (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (34% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (36% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (28% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.67% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.67% fail on Other suspension component
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (18% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Chassis (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Chassis condition (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Transmission (6.7% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts (12% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Joints (29% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Drive shaft
      • 2.0% fail on Prop shafts (59% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Prop shaft (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system (8.4% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (5.2% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4.4% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system (74% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Pipe
      • 0.67% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.3% fail on Towbar (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.67% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 1.3% fail on Cabs (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.67% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.67% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.67% fail on Body
      • 0.67% fail on Other body component
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp (20% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (14% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (23% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps (38% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp (32% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (29% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (29% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (28% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (46% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type (46% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (23% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (43% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment (56% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies) (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 6.0% fail on Visibility (41% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers (27% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (37% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 6.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (35% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Seat belts (81% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
  • 5.3% fail on Steering (21% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components (24% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Intermediate drop arm (33 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering (88% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Operation
      • 0.67% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.67% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (12% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (16% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition (6.3% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (27% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Fluid leaks (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (34% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth (27% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition (19% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 0.67% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plates