Nissan D22 MOT Results
Registered in 200355.8% pass rate
from 308 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan D22 is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.5% fail on Headlamp
- 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.65% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.65% fail on Horn
-
0.97% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.97% fail on Position lamp
-
0.32% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamps
-
18% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 7.1% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
5.5% fail on
Chassis
(100% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Chassis condition (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
3.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.9% fail on
Transmission
-
1.9% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.9% fail on Joints
-
0.97% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.65% fail on Joints
- 0.32% fail on Bearing housing
-
1.9% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.3% fail on
Body
- 0.65% fail on Mounting fixings (8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Body condition
- 0.32% fail on Other body component
-
1.3% fail on
Cabs
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Bumpers
-
0.32% fail on
Doors
-
0.32% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.32% fail on Door condition
-
0.32% fail on
Driver's door
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
7.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.9% fail on Ball joint
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.32% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
- 4.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.97% fail on Linkage
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint
- 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.9% fail on
Springs
-
1.3% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.97% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
- 0.32% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.65% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.3% fail on
Leaf springs
-
0.32% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint
-
7.5% fail on
Suspension arms
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
8.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Rbt
- 5.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.8% fail on
Rbt
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(68% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.97% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt
- 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.32% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt
-
0.65% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(88% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(88% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(88% better than other 2003 vans)
-
5.8% fail on
Service brake performance
- 6.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.3% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Pedal
- 1.3% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.97% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.65% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.32% fail on Brake linings
- 0.32% fail on Brake pads
-
0.32% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.32% fail on Brake discs
-
0.65% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.65% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.65% fail on Lever
- 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
8.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.1% fail on
Visibility
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 4.2% fail on Washers
-
0.32% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.32% fail on Windscreen
-
5.5% fail on
Steering
-
2.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.65% fail on Drag link end
- 0.65% fail on Intermediate drop arm (10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Locking devices (13 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Track rod end
- 0.32% fail on Lock stop
-
1.9% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Other components
-
0.65% fail on
Steering play
- 0.32% fail on Steering box
- 0.32% fail on Steering rack
- 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.32% fail on Steering wheel
-
2.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.97% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on Size/type
-
2.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.32% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
-
2.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.32% fail on Requirements
- 0.65% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 2.3% fail on Registration plates
-
0.97% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.97% fail on Attachment