Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Nissan D22 MOT Results

Registered in 2003
59.2% pass rate
from 422 tests in 2020
(19% better than other 2003 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan D22 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.8% fail on Service brake performance (64% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 7.6% fail on Rbt (63% worse than other 2003 vans)
          • 7.3% fail on Service brake performance (96% worse than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.95% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.71% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt
          • 0.71% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.47% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.47% fail on Linkage (10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.24% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.95% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.95% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.95% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.71% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.71% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.47% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.24% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.24% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (67% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (67% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.24% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.24% fail on Switch
    • 0.24% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.24% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system (78% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Chassis
      • 4.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.1% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.7% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Joints
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts (68% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Joints (67% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.71% fail on Pipe
      • 0.24% fail on Tank
      • 0.24% fail on System
    • 0.95% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.95% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.95% fail on Body
      • 0.47% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Panel
      • 0.24% fail on Other body component
    • 0.47% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.47% fail on Towbar
      • 0.47% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.24% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.24% fail on Carrier
    • 0.24% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.24% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.24% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.24% fail on Cabs
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.71% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Linkage
      • 0.71% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.9% fail on Springs
      • 1.2% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.2% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.71% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.71% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.24% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.24% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 9.5% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.71% fail on View to rear
      • 0.71% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.7% fail on Steering
    • 3.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.95% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Intermediate drop arm (15 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Other components (14 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Steering linkage (17 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Steering component
      • 0.24% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.24% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.95% fail on Power steering
      • 0.71% fail on Operation
      • 0.24% fail on Other components
    • 0.47% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.47% fail on Steering box (14 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.24% fail on Steering play
      • 0.24% fail on Steering box
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.71% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.95% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.47% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.47% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.24% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.24% fail on Requirements
    • 0.47% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.71% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.47% fail on Attachment
    • 0.24% fail on Condition
  • 0.47% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Speedometer (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)