MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » D22 » 2004

Nissan D22 MOT Results

Registered in 2004
54.4% pass rate
from 689 tests in 2017
(11% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan D22 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (32% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 9.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (57% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (57% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps (57% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (62% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.15% fail on Horn
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (48% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 10% fail on Components
        • 9.1% fail on Pipes (54% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Valves
        • 0.87% fail on Hoses
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.29% fail on Leaks
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.6% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage (32 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake slack adjuster
      • 0.15% fail on Cable
      • 0.15% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.15% fail on Pivot
    • 0.73% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
        • 0.44% fail on Anti-slip
  • 18% fail on Suspension (28% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.44% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 4.8% fail on Wheel bearings (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Front (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Rear
    • 4.5% fail on Front suspension joints (86% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas (50% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Spring mounting
      • 1.3% fail on Component mounting (66% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.8% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.73% fail on Shackle
        • 0.15% fail on Anchor
      • 0.29% fail on Securing bolts
      • 0.15% fail on Spring saddle
    • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts (51% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Front drive shafts (53% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (56% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Couplings
      • 0.15% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (76% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (86% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.73% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on General condition
  • 9.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 4.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.44% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (45% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (96% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.73% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on System
    • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.58% fail on Emissions
  • 7.0% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (68% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Steering pivot point (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Steering arm (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Free play
        • 0.29% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.15% fail on Steering box
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Lock stop
    • 2.3% fail on Power steering (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Other components
      • 0.15% fail on Drive system
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.29% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.15% fail on Steering control
      • 0.15% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.15% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 4.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis
    • 1.0% fail on Body condition (71% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Speedometer (16 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.15% fail on Load security
      • 0.15% fail on Loading door
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (70% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (61% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas (64% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
    • 0.15% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.15% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.58% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.58% fail on Attachment
  • 0.29% fail on Towbars
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar
    • 0.15% fail on Vehicle structure