Nissan D22 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
59.6% pass rate
from 203 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan D22 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.9% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 9.4% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 9.4% fail on Service brake performance (200% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.49% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.49% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.99% fail on Rbt
          • 0.99% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.49% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.49% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.99% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
      • 0.49% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.99% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.99% fail on Lever
    • 0.99% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.49% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.49% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.49% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.5% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 13% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.99% fail on Suspension arm (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.99% fail on Springs
      • 0.99% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.49% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.49% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.49% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.49% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Chassis
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 1.5% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.99% fail on Joints
        • 0.49% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.49% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.49% fail on Joints
    • 2.0% fail on Body
      • 0.99% fail on Panel
      • 0.49% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.49% fail on Other body component
    • 0.49% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.49% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.49% fail on Pipe
    • 0.49% fail on Towbar
      • 0.49% fail on Other towbar components
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.49% fail on Condition
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility (56% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.99% fail on Other leaks (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.49% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.99% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.49% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.0% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.49% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.49% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.49% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.99% fail on Power steering
      • 0.99% fail on Operation
    • 0.49% fail on Steering play
      • 0.49% fail on Steering box
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.99% fail on Condition
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.49% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.49% fail on Speedometer