MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Interstar » 2005

Nissan Interstar MOT Results

Registered in 2005
45.6% pass rate
from 125 tests in 2020
(9.5% worse than other 2005 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Interstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Direction indicators (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Flashing type (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (60% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.80% fail on Switch
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (17% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (27% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (23% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (16% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (14% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (14% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (15% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (46% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Electrical equipment (3.4% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Horn (35% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.80% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.80% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.80% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 20% fail on Brakes (12% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 7.2% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 5.6% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (97% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (99% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (6.4% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (15% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (13% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (9.9% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (89% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (65% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads (26% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake linings (41 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Lever (15 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (37% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Hand lever (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Load sensing valves (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 14% fail on Suspension (31% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Suspension arms (7.4% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Ball joint (32% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.6% fail on Other suspension component (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.80% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.80% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.80% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Visibility (31% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Wipers (83% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Washers (21% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.6% fail on Steering (53% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Steering linkage components (6.4% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end (1.1% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint
    • 4.0% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.80% fail on Rams
  • 8.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (39% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure (25% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (25% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system (53% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.80% fail on Joints
      • 0.80% fail on Belts
    • 1.6% fail on Doors (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Driver's door (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Chassis
      • 0.80% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.80% fail on Load security
      • 0.80% fail on Loading door
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres (21% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (40% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (10% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (31% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Fluid leaks (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.80% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.80% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
  • 0.80% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.80% fail on Attachment