MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Interstar » 2005
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Interstar MOT Results

Registered in 2005
51.3% pass rate
from 152 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Interstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.66% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.3% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Lamp (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Switch
    • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 0.66% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.66% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 28% fail on Brakes (45% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 26% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 22% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 16% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.66% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.3% fail on Hub components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.3% fail on Brake calipers (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.3% fail on Components
        • 3.3% fail on Pipes
      • 0.66% fail on Leaks
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical components
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (36 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.66% fail on Pedal
        • 0.66% fail on Anti-slip
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 7.2% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 4.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.66% fail on Front
      • 0.66% fail on Rear
    • 0.66% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.66% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.66% fail on Shackle
    • 0.66% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.66% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.66% fail on Spring mounting
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Windscreen
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Bonnet (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.9% fail on Steering
    • 8.6% fail on Steering system
      • 5.3% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Free play (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.66% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering
      • 0.66% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.66% fail on Pump
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Size/type (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Condition
  • 5.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 4.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 2.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.6% fail on Doors
      • 2.0% fail on Passengers front (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Drivers
  • 1.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system